Hi Nathan!

On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 09:34:51 -0400, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org> wrote:
> On 10/09/15 09:26, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > You mean the cp_parser_oacc_loop and cp_parser_oacc_kernels_parallel
> > functions need documentation?  I agree it's a bit terse, but documenting
> > these by just listing the accepted parsing tokens "# pragma acc loop"
> > etc., followed by the *_CLAUSE_MASKs is what's done for the other
> > OpenACC/OpenMP directives in the C/C++ front ends.  So, I don't see a
> > reason to be different for these two?
> 
> 
> What's the p_name argument for?

It's s string describing the pragma as parsed thus far.  Again, not
documenting that as well as our usage of it is totally "standard", see
OpenMP's cp_parser_omp_parallel, cp_parser_omp_for, and many more.


Grüße,
 Thomas