public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>
To: ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,  bernds@codesourcery.com
Subject: Re: Extend widening_mul pass to handle fixed-point types
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8739v0f6l7.fsf@firetop.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1280399607.10110.33.camel@e102325-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (Ramana	Radhakrishnan's message of "Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:33:27 +0100")

Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com> writes:
>> Could you give the attached patch a try?  It also fixes a case where
>> the code could create mixed sign-and-unsigned maccs (a bug that existed
>> before my patch) and a botched call to is_widening_mult_p (a bug
>> introduced by my patch, sorry).
>
> Your patch didn't apply cleanly to pristine trunk or to 162431 and I had
> to do a manual merge so I'm not sure if I got all parts of it. 
>
> Just to be absolutely clear, you still need to check for
> is_gimple_assign before using the stmt in gimple_assign_lhs in
> is_widening_mult_p or do you expect that to get subsumed by your patch ?
> Otherwise the compiler ICEs with this testcase [ice-on-gimple-phi.c]. 

For the record -- since I accidentally took this off-list when I started
using the gmail web interface, sorry about that -- the problems Ramana
had applying the patch were due to some kind of mailer issue.  The ICE
in ice-on-gimple-phi.c was due to the s/rhs1_stmt/rhs2_stmt/ part being
missing from the manually-applied patch.

Richard

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-31  7:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-18 12:03 Richard Sandiford
2010-07-18 20:47 ` Bernd Schmidt
2010-07-19 18:35   ` Richard Sandiford
2010-07-19 21:53     ` Bernd Schmidt
2010-07-27 12:28       ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2010-07-27 15:54         ` Bernd Schmidt
2010-07-27 17:10           ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2010-07-28 15:43           ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2010-07-28 21:20             ` Richard Sandiford
2010-07-29 10:39               ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2010-07-31  9:45                 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2010-07-31  9:45               ` Richard Sandiford
2010-07-31 13:03                 ` Bernd Schmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8739v0f6l7.fsf@firetop.home \
    --to=rdsandiford@googlemail.com \
    --cc=bernds@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).