public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
To: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Reduce scope of a few 'class loop *loop' variables (was: [PATCH v4] Use range-based for loops for traversing loops)
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 15:24:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874k81y6ln.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45eedc54-f588-b720-d6c7-8a23a36752d0@linux.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 751 bytes --]

Hi!

On 2021-07-30T15:58:36+0800, "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> on 2021/7/30 下午3:18, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> Curious why in some instances we're not removing the 'class loop *loop'
>> declaration, I had a look, and this may suggest some further clean-up?
>
> [...] I like your nice proposed further clean-up,
> thanks for doing that!

Ping for my patch to "Reduce scope of a few 'class loop *loop' variables",
see attached.


Grüße
 Thomas


-----------------
Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht München, HRB 106955

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Reduce-scope-of-a-few-class-loop-loop-variables.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 6484 bytes --]

From 6051ff3a4ba0b8f44ecb262e4553f8a471c66237 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 09:23:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Reduce scope of a few 'class loop *loop' variables

Further clean-up after commit e41ba804ba5f5ca433e09238d561b1b4c8b10985
"Use range-based for loops for traversing loops".  No functional change.

	gcc/
	* cfgloop.c (verify_loop_structure): Reduce scope of
	'class loop *loop' variable.
	* ipa-fnsummary.c (analyze_function_body): Likewise.
	* loop-init.c (fix_loop_structure): Likewise.
	* loop-invariant.c (calculate_loop_reg_pressure): Likewise.
	* predict.c (predict_loops): Likewise.
	* tree-loop-distribution.c (loop_distribution::execute): Likewise.
	* tree-vectorizer.c (pass_vectorize::execute): Likewise.
---
 gcc/cfgloop.c                | 3 +--
 gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c          | 3 +--
 gcc/loop-init.c              | 2 +-
 gcc/loop-invariant.c         | 4 ++--
 gcc/predict.c                | 3 +--
 gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c | 2 +-
 gcc/tree-vectorizer.c        | 5 ++---
 7 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cfgloop.c b/gcc/cfgloop.c
index 20c24c13c36..3190d12b2ce 100644
--- a/gcc/cfgloop.c
+++ b/gcc/cfgloop.c
@@ -1398,7 +1398,6 @@ verify_loop_structure (void)
 {
   unsigned *sizes, i, j;
   basic_block bb, *bbs;
-  class loop *loop;
   int err = 0;
   edge e;
   unsigned num = number_of_loops (cfun);
@@ -1689,7 +1688,7 @@ verify_loop_structure (void)
 	      for (; exit; exit = exit->next_e)
 		eloops++;
 
-	      for (loop = bb->loop_father;
+	      for (class loop *loop = bb->loop_father;
 		   loop != e->dest->loop_father
 		   /* When a loop exit is also an entry edge which
 		      can happen when avoiding CFG manipulations
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c b/gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c
index 7e9201a554a..cb13d2e4b3c 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-fnsummary.c
@@ -2934,7 +2934,6 @@ analyze_function_body (struct cgraph_node *node, bool early)
   if (nonconstant_names.exists () && !early)
     {
       ipa_fn_summary *s = ipa_fn_summaries->get (node);
-      class loop *loop;
       unsigned max_loop_predicates = opt_for_fn (node->decl,
 						 param_ipa_max_loop_predicates);
 
@@ -2978,7 +2977,7 @@ analyze_function_body (struct cgraph_node *node, bool early)
       /* To avoid quadratic behavior we analyze stride predicates only
          with respect to the containing loop.  Thus we simply iterate
 	 over all defs in the outermost loop body.  */
-      for (loop = loops_for_fn (cfun)->tree_root->inner;
+      for (class loop *loop = loops_for_fn (cfun)->tree_root->inner;
 	   loop != NULL; loop = loop->next)
 	{
 	  ipa_predicate loop_stride = true;
diff --git a/gcc/loop-init.c b/gcc/loop-init.c
index 04054ef6222..f0931a99661 100644
--- a/gcc/loop-init.c
+++ b/gcc/loop-init.c
@@ -201,7 +201,6 @@ fix_loop_structure (bitmap changed_bbs)
 {
   basic_block bb;
   int record_exits = 0;
-  class loop *loop;
   unsigned old_nloops, i;
 
   timevar_push (TV_LOOP_INIT);
@@ -279,6 +278,7 @@ fix_loop_structure (bitmap changed_bbs)
 
   /* Finally free deleted loops.  */
   bool any_deleted = false;
+  class loop *loop;
   FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (*get_loops (cfun), i, loop)
     if (loop && loop->header == NULL)
       {
diff --git a/gcc/loop-invariant.c b/gcc/loop-invariant.c
index fca0c2b24be..5eee2e5c9f8 100644
--- a/gcc/loop-invariant.c
+++ b/gcc/loop-invariant.c
@@ -2134,7 +2134,7 @@ calculate_loop_reg_pressure (void)
   basic_block bb;
   rtx_insn *insn;
   rtx link;
-  class loop *loop, *parent;
+  class loop *parent;
 
   for (auto loop : loops_list (cfun, 0))
     if (loop->aux == NULL)
@@ -2151,7 +2151,7 @@ calculate_loop_reg_pressure (void)
       if (curr_loop == current_loops->tree_root)
 	continue;
 
-      for (loop = curr_loop;
+      for (class loop *loop = curr_loop;
 	   loop != current_loops->tree_root;
 	   loop = loop_outer (loop))
 	bitmap_ior_into (&LOOP_DATA (loop)->regs_live, DF_LR_IN (bb));
diff --git a/gcc/predict.c b/gcc/predict.c
index 68b11135680..3cb4e3c0eb5 100644
--- a/gcc/predict.c
+++ b/gcc/predict.c
@@ -1927,7 +1927,6 @@ predict_extra_loop_exits (edge exit_edge)
 static void
 predict_loops (void)
 {
-  class loop *loop;
   basic_block bb;
   hash_set <class loop *> with_recursion(10);
 
@@ -1941,7 +1940,7 @@ predict_loops (void)
 	    && (decl = gimple_call_fndecl (gsi_stmt (gsi))) != NULL
 	    && recursive_call_p (current_function_decl, decl))
 	  {
-	    loop = bb->loop_father;
+	    class loop *loop = bb->loop_father;
 	    while (loop && !with_recursion.add (loop))
 	      loop = loop_outer (loop);
 	  }
diff --git a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
index 583c01a42d8..c9e18739165 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-loop-distribution.c
@@ -3737,7 +3737,6 @@ prepare_perfect_loop_nest (class loop *loop)
 unsigned int
 loop_distribution::execute (function *fun)
 {
-  class loop *loop;
   bool changed = false;
   basic_block bb;
   control_dependences *cd = NULL;
@@ -3845,6 +3844,7 @@ loop_distribution::execute (function *fun)
       /* Destroy loop bodies that could not be reused.  Do this late as we
 	 otherwise can end up refering to stale data in control dependences.  */
       unsigned i;
+      class loop *loop;
       FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (loops_to_be_destroyed, i, loop)
 	destroy_loop (loop);
 
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c b/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c
index 0e1cee99bae..f4a2873a91e 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vectorizer.c
@@ -1209,7 +1209,6 @@ pass_vectorize::execute (function *fun)
   unsigned int i;
   unsigned int num_vectorized_loops = 0;
   unsigned int vect_loops_num;
-  class loop *loop;
   hash_table<simduid_to_vf> *simduid_to_vf_htab = NULL;
   hash_table<simd_array_to_simduid> *simd_array_to_simduid_htab = NULL;
   bool any_ifcvt_loops = false;
@@ -1293,7 +1292,7 @@ pass_vectorize::execute (function *fun)
   if (any_ifcvt_loops)
     for (i = 1; i < number_of_loops (fun); i++)
       {
-	loop = get_loop (fun, i);
+	class loop *loop = get_loop (fun, i);
 	if (loop && loop->dont_vectorize)
 	  {
 	    gimple *g = vect_loop_vectorized_call (loop);
@@ -1342,7 +1341,7 @@ pass_vectorize::execute (function *fun)
       loop_vec_info loop_vinfo;
       bool has_mask_store;
 
-      loop = get_loop (fun, i);
+      class loop *loop = get_loop (fun, i);
       if (!loop || !loop->aux)
 	continue;
       loop_vinfo = (loop_vec_info) loop->aux;
-- 
2.33.0


  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-24 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-19  6:20 [RFC/PATCH] Use range-based for loops for traversing loops Kewen.Lin
2021-07-19  6:26 ` Andrew Pinski
2021-07-20  8:56   ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-19 14:08 ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-07-20  8:56   ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-19 14:34 ` Richard Biener
2021-07-20  8:57   ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-19 15:59 ` Martin Sebor
2021-07-20  8:58   ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-20  9:49     ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-07-20  9:50       ` Jonathan Wakely
2021-07-20 14:42       ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-20 14:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Kewen.Lin
2021-07-22 12:56   ` Richard Biener
2021-07-22 12:56     ` Richard Biener
2021-07-23  8:41     ` [PATCH] Make loops_list support an optional loop_p root Kewen.Lin
2021-07-23 16:26       ` Martin Sebor
2021-07-27  2:25         ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-29  8:01       ` Richard Biener
2021-07-30  5:20         ` [PATCH v2] " Kewen.Lin
2021-08-03 12:08           ` Richard Biener
2021-08-04  2:36             ` [PATCH v3] " Kewen.Lin
2021-08-04 10:01               ` Richard Biener
2021-08-04 10:47                 ` Kewen.Lin
2021-08-04 12:04                   ` Richard Biener
2021-08-05  8:50                     ` Kewen.Lin
2021-07-23  8:35   ` [PATCH v3] Use range-based for loops for traversing loops Kewen.Lin
2021-07-23 16:10     ` Martin Sebor
2021-07-27  2:10       ` [PATCH v4] " Kewen.Lin
2021-07-29  7:48         ` Richard Biener
2021-07-30  7:18         ` Thomas Schwinge
2021-07-30  7:58           ` Kewen.Lin
2021-11-24 14:24             ` Thomas Schwinge [this message]
2021-11-24 16:58               ` Reduce scope of a few 'class loop *loop' variables (was: [PATCH v4] Use range-based for loops for traversing loops) Martin Jambor
2021-11-24 19:44               ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874k81y6ln.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net \
    --to=thomas@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).