From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from esa4.mentor.iphmx.com (esa4.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.137.252]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98FF83858D33 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:50:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 98FF83858D33 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codesourcery.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mentor.com X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.97,302,1669104000"; d="scan'208";a="97235443" Received: from orw-gwy-01-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.165]) by esa4.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 16 Feb 2023 06:50:42 -0800 IronPort-SDR: xVIk+fmy+cnA1Ln3fRxybLRhi9npHQ1Q11hJTBEc8T1hcu68jUG73K7qxxTNOTzFbWKBYpKeyQ JIIDm5VMEYPtHve5abRxEBsJqp6VWIoE0oUq+fFuAUkNCR5tqzUMAA3vt9k7oqsdqb1rlJ8pO4 VvPL04IwoGKC0wbixoU4vVPdddpyXO8FCv0aCp7C1wqJ4Y5nPZqYinOsmA8f1834+yHJVcDdxU Fn3DXboThVP0s/+WbeHBfFAHaILIeKK4SMMkwMgepQqc8uIGt4Y60ycDTFtNiklBEI/TjJ8neq beY= From: Thomas Schwinge To: Jakub Jelinek , Tobias Burnus CC: Subject: 'libgomp.fortran/target-nowait-array-section.f90' (was: [committed] libgomp: Fix comment typo) In-Reply-To: References: <87iljk4ji8.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3+94~g74c3f1b (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/28.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:50:34 +0100 Message-ID: <877cwhzmth.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90] X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-11.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.11) To svr-ies-mbx-10.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.10) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi! On 2023-02-16T12:20:17+0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > I saw > FAIL: libgomp.fortran/target-nowait-array-section.f90 -O execution tes= t > in my last x86_64-linux bootstrap. From quick skimming, it might be just > unreliable test, which assumes that asynchronous execution wouldn't produ= ce > ordered sequence, but can't it happen even with asynchronous execution? Yes, that does match my findings reported a while ago, see: . Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe Thomas ----------------- Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstra=C3=9Fe 201= , 80634 M=C3=BCnchen; Gesellschaft mit beschr=C3=A4nkter Haftung; Gesch=C3= =A4ftsf=C3=BChrer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Th=C3=BCrauf; Sitz der Gesellschaf= t: M=C3=BCnchen; Registergericht M=C3=BCnchen, HRB 106955