Hi!

On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 20:55:35 -0400, Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde@tbsaunde.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 09:32:37AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 09/18/2015 07:32 AM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > >On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 03:11:14PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > >>On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 09:16 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > >>>I gave changing from gimple to gimple * a shot last week.

> ok, its committed now :)

I guess the following should also be adjusted?

    gcc/doc/gimple.texi:@subsection @code{gimple_statement_base} (gsbase)
    gcc/doc/gimple.texi:@cindex gimple_statement_base
    gcc/doc/gimple.texi:Inherited from @code{struct gimple_statement_base}.
    gcc/doc/gimple.texi:   gimple_statement_base
    gcc/doc/gimple.texi:codes.  Then you must add a corresponding gimple_statement_base subclass
    gcc/doc/gimple.texi:as a pointer to the appropriate gimple_statement_base subclass.
    gcc/gdbhooks.py:    pp.add_printer_for_types(['gimple', 'gimple_statement_base *',
    gcc/gimple.h:   always stored in gimple_statement_base.subcode and they may only be
    gcc/gimple.h:     This is different than the BLOCK field in gimple_statement_base,
    gcc/gimple.h:   Note: This is based on gimple_statement_base, not g_s_omp, because g_s_omp

    gcc/doc/gimple.texi:@subsection @code{gimple_statement_base} (gsbase)
    gcc/doc/gimple.texi:@item        @code{gsbase}           @tab 256        
    gcc/doc/gimple.texi:@item @code{gsbase}
    gcc/doc/gimple.texi:@item @code{gsbase}          @tab 256


Grüße,
 Thomas