From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16420 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2007 09:55:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 16382 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2007 09:55:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (HELO smtp.nildram.co.uk) (195.149.33.74) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:55:23 +0000 Received: from firetop.home (85-211-136-23.dyn.gotadsl.co.uk [85.211.136.23]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBCE2DDCEC; Sat, 1 Dec 2007 09:55:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from richard by firetop.home with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IyP4B-00013x-T0; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:55:19 +0000 From: Richard Sandiford To: Mark Mitchell Mail-Followup-To: Mark Mitchell ,Rask Ingemann Lambertsen , Bernd Schmidt , Jie Zhang , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, GCC Patches , hp@gcc.gnu.org, dj@redhat.com, rsandifo@nildram.co.uk Cc: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen , Bernd Schmidt , Jie Zhang , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, GCC Patches , hp@gcc.gnu.org, dj@redhat.com Subject: Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES References: <474C8FA4.2040603@codesourcery.com> <474C95BA.1060807@t-online.de> <474C96C1.7010208@codesourcery.com> <474C98AA.50105@t-online.de> <474C9A65.2060902@codesourcery.com> <474C9B33.8060503@t-online.de> <474C9CBD.2070708@codesourcery.com> <87fxyqdc45.fsf@firetop.home> <474D943C.4030106@codesourcery.com> <877ik0aerh.fsf@firetop.home> <20071130022132.GL17368@sygehus.dk> <87sl2o6s1g.fsf@firetop.home> <47505D76.4040207@codesourcery.com> Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:55:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <47505D76.4040207@codesourcery.com> (Mark Mitchell's message of "Fri\, 30 Nov 2007 10\:59\:02 -0800") Message-ID: <878x4eu4c8.fsf@firetop.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-12/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2 Mark Mitchell writes: > Richard Sandiford wrote: >> 2006-04-18 DJ Delorie >> >> * configure.in (m32c): Build libstdc++-v3. Pass flags to >> reference libgloss so that libssp can be built in a combined >> tree. >> * configure: Regenerate. > >> Mark, DJ? Do you agree it's OK to drop that hunk? > > I'm not quite sure if you're asking for agreement to leave it in our > sourcebase, or to remove it therefrom, so, unambiguously: Yeah, sorry about that. And... > I would prefer to revert DJ's change, for the same reason as the other > changes under discussion, so that we're consistent across architectures. ...I was indeed asking whether I could remove that hunk from the source, rather than restoring it to its original position. Anyway, given that there have been objections to the patch generally, I realise that the pre-approval is void. Richard