From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 64231 invoked by alias); 29 Jul 2015 09:22:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 64222 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jul 2015 09:22:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 09:22:17 +0000 Received: from nat-ies.mentorg.com ([192.94.31.2] helo=SVR-IES-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1ZKNYy-0000lJ-Qc from Thomas_Schwinge@mentor.com ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 02:22:13 -0700 Received: from feldtkeller.schwinge.homeip.net (137.202.0.76) by SVR-IES-FEM-02.mgc.mentorg.com (137.202.0.106) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 10:22:11 +0100 From: Thomas Schwinge To: Nathan Sidwell CC: Jakub Jelinek , GCC Patches Subject: Re: [gomp4] Redesign oacc_parallel launch API In-Reply-To: <55B7B332.1010603@acm.org> References: <55B7B332.1010603@acm.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9-101-g81dad07 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (i586-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 09:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87a8ufqpxg.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02440.txt.bz2 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 791 Hi Nathan! On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 12:52:02 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: > I've committed this patch to the gomp4 branch to redo the launch API. I'= ll post=20 > a version for trunk once the versioning patch gets approved & committed. Thanks! (I have not yet looked at the patch in detail.) There is one regression: PASS: libgomp.oacc-fortran/asyncwait-2.f90 -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_nvidia=3D1= -DACC_MEM_SHARED=3D0 -O0 (test for excess errors) [-PASS:-]{+FAIL:+} libgomp.oacc-fortran/asyncwait-2.f90 -DACC_DEVICE_TY= PE_nvidia=3D1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=3D0 -O0 execution test libgomp: Trying to map into device [0x10f7930..0x10f7a30) object when [= 0x10f7930..0x10f7a30) is already mapped Likewise for the other torture testing flags. Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Thomas --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-length: 472 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVuJs7AAoJEK3/DN1sMFFtqI0H+QE4wPyw+7R7exrPlhGyhM8F TcDy2g4qPS6Cwu/YHQiAoeFGntvU3rJb71Fwkvht41OxNjAoAKT7NYijItdqh06+ rqf7SoIWRumNAIhNZVI2A5hIC/GyuDf8D9O60ARbYKElLxNmnJLF0NBsoGnyigWG VB63h1c/Lo7m1km4Tm652QBetsJ+SOUQLnUkM1K/QJgx5T0luTP2M5nN3CmcAJef /3HthkJH7PDTObd8PJ0EQDd7iL49LaIJBo0ijQcfGqMlVP9BA9QTV4T6TRatC87x TtuUuIa3qtmf1fSAtDvXsTenEYFQ8mOUhcRPmRuEUjG2p3HOUAuEVw/fTN4QyyA= =0iid -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--