From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29369 invoked by alias); 20 May 2014 10:09:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29337 invoked by uid 89); 20 May 2014 10:09:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f179.google.com Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f179.google.com) (209.85.212.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 20 May 2014 10:09:13 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id bs8so633113wib.0 for ; Tue, 20 May 2014 03:09:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.14.233 with SMTP id s9mr2978842wic.53.1400580550215; Tue, 20 May 2014 03:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2.26.169.52]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wl6sm13529647wjc.6.2014.05.20.03.09.08 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 May 2014 03:09:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Sandiford To: Charles Baylis Mail-Followup-To: Charles Baylis ,GCC Patches , rdsandiford@googlemail.com Cc: GCC Patches Subject: Re: RFA: speeding up dg-extract-results.sh References: <878utfe5g0.fsf@talisman.default> <874n0llk0v.fsf@talisman.default> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 10:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Charles Baylis's message of "Mon, 19 May 2014 19:49:42 +0100") Message-ID: <87a9ackbi3.fsf@talisman.default> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg01595.txt.bz2 Charles Baylis writes: > On 19 May 2014 19:07, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> >> Sorry for the breakage. I wanted to make the script as picky as I could >> get away with though, so that results aren't lost accidentally. >> >> Could you try the attached? > > That works for me. Thanks. I also tested it on x86_64-linux-gnu. Applied as obvious (I hope). Richard