public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>,
	Joseph Myers	<joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	James Norris <jnorris@codesourcery.com>,
	Cesar Philippidis <cesar@codesourcery.com>,
	<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PR c/64765, c/64880] Support OpenACC Combined Directives in C, C++
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 13:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bnc8cgw6.fsf@schwinge.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5617B27D.7010602@acm.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2770 bytes --]

Hi!

Thanks to Joseph and you for your review!

On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 08:26:37 -0400, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org> wrote:
> On 10/08/15 12:39, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Some bits extracted out of gomp-4_0-branch, and some other bits
> > rewritten; here is a patch to support OpenACC Combined Directives in C,
> > C++.  (The Fortran front end already does support these.)
> >
> > As far as I know, Jakub is not available at this time, so maybe the C
> > (Joseph) and C++ (Jason, Nathan) front end maintainers could please
> > review this, instead of him?  (The front end changes as well as the few
> > other cleanup changes should all be straight forward.)  OK for trunk once
> > bootstrap tested?

Assuming the following review comments resolved, does this constitute
approval for the whole patch?  (Will of course address any later review
comments, as usual.)

> > --- gcc/cp/parser.c
> > +++ gcc/cp/parser.c
> > @@ -33132,69 +33132,64 @@ cp_parser_oacc_enter_exit_data (cp_parser *parser, cp_token *pragma_tok,
> 
> > -/* OpenACC 2.0:
> >      # pragma acc loop oacc-loop-clause[optseq] new-line
> >        structured-block  */
> >
> >   #define OACC_LOOP_CLAUSE_MASK						\
> >   	( (OMP_CLAUSE_MASK_1 << PRAGMA_OACC_CLAUSE_COLLAPSE)		\
> > -	| (OMP_CLAUSE_MASK_1 << PRAGMA_OACC_CLAUSE_REDUCTION))
> > +	| (OMP_CLAUSE_MASK_1 << PRAGMA_OACC_CLAUSE_REDUCTION) )
> >
> >   static tree
> > -cp_parser_oacc_loop (cp_parser *parser, cp_token *pragma_tok)
> > +cp_parser_oacc_loop (cp_parser *parser, cp_token *pragma_tok, char *p_name,
> > +		     omp_clause_mask mask, tree *cclauses)
> >
> 
> Needs documentation.
> 
> 
> >   static tree
> > -cp_parser_oacc_parallel (cp_parser *parser, cp_token *pragma_tok)
> > +cp_parser_oacc_kernels_parallel (cp_parser *parser, cp_token *pragma_tok,
> > +				 char *p_name)
> 
> Likewise,

You mean the cp_parser_oacc_loop and cp_parser_oacc_kernels_parallel
functions need documentation?  I agree it's a bit terse, but documenting
these by just listing the accepted parsing tokens "# pragma acc loop"
etc., followed by the *_CLAUSE_MASKs is what's done for the other
OpenACC/OpenMP directives in the C/C++ front ends.  So, I don't see a
reason to be different for these two?

> > --- gcc/cp/semantics.c
> > +++ gcc/cp/semantics.c
> > @@ -6124,8 +6124,17 @@ finish_omp_structured_block (tree block)
> >     return do_poplevel (block);
> >   }
> >
> > +/* Similarly, except force the retention of the BLOCK.  */
> 
> similar to what?
> 
> > +
> > +tree
> > +begin_omp_parallel (void)

I just moved begin_omp_parallel up a little bit in the file (where it
originally resided); the "similarly" applies to the function defined just
before.


Grüße,
 Thomas

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 472 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-09 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-08 16:39 Thomas Schwinge
2015-10-08 16:47 ` Joseph Myers
2015-10-09 12:26 ` Nathan Sidwell
2015-10-09 13:26   ` Thomas Schwinge [this message]
2015-10-09 13:34     ` Nathan Sidwell
2015-10-09 13:57       ` Jakub Jelinek
2015-10-09 14:00       ` Thomas Schwinge
2015-10-11 22:19         ` Nathan Sidwell
2015-10-27  8:52 ` Thomas Schwinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bnc8cgw6.fsf@schwinge.name \
    --to=thomas@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=cesar@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=jnorris@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=nathan@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).