From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6065 invoked by alias); 20 Jun 2013 13:09:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6046 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jun 2013 13:09:15 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from www.axiomatics.org (HELO mail.axiomatics.org) (66.228.53.191) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:09:14 +0000 Received: by mail.axiomatics.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 451D2ED5C; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:09:11 -0500 (CDT) From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: Jason Merrill Cc: Andrew Sutton , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [c++-concepts] code review In-Reply-To: <51C2FD43.8090209@redhat.com> (Jason Merrill's message of "Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:01:55 -0400") References: <51B0B0ED.5090508@redhat.com> <51B0F122.6020301@redhat.com> <51B62961.1080409@redhat.com> <51B8A36C.1080005@redhat.com> <51BBC613.5040708@redhat.com> <51BF617D.3080101@redhat.com> <51C1BE59.6040400@redhat.com> <51C2FD43.8090209@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 13:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87bo716ia0.fsf@euclid.axiomatics.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg01202.txt.bz2 Jason Merrill writes: | On 06/20/2013 01:30 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > As I discussed | > with Andrew a couple of weeks ago, I have been holding back the | > merge from trunk because he has these patch series in the queue. | | Incidentally, since the code is going onto a branch, we don't really | need to delay checkins based on code review; I'd actually rather | review the code from within git than from an email patch. Makes sense. Andrew, you can check in what you have now, and refine based on all other comments. I won't have network connection until tonight; at that point I will do the merge from trunk. We don't want to have the branch too old compared to the trunk. -- Gaby