From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17216 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2013 10:41:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 17156 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2013 10:41:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:41:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0BAfaKd029272 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 05:41:36 -0500 Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-53.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.53]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0BAfYFh030846 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 05:41:35 -0500 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 24D899F1A4; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:41:34 +0100 (CET) From: Dodji Seketeli To: Gabriel Dos Reis Cc: GCC Patches , Jason Merrill Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR c++/55663 - constexpr function templ instantiation considered non-const as alias templ arg References: <877gnnwzdg.fsf@redhat.com> <87hamqtlum.fsf@redhat.com> <87k3rlrrkw.fsf@redhat.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Gabriel Dos Reis's message of "Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:02:32 -0600") Message-ID: <87bocwovc1.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00589.txt.bz2 Gabriel Dos Reis writes: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote: >> >> Also, I am not sure if this patch would be appropriate for commit, now >> that we are in 'regression-only' mode. But seeing this alias-template >> related thing not working hurts me. :) So at worst I'll schedule the >> patch for when stage1 opens again. > > It is certainly a blocker for some people here using both constexpr > and template alias. (The code uses a technique documented in the > upcoming 4th edition of TC++PL which is due anytime now. It would be > embarrassing if GCC-4.8 didn't accept it.) /me nods. Hopefully when the review is done, we can ask our friendly release managers to consider interceding for us in this matter. :-) -- Dodji