From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-119300-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26534 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2004 01:08:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26519 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2004 01:08:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.5)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 12 Jun 2004 01:08:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 12342 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2004 01:08:13 -0000
Received: from taltos.codesourcery.com (zack@66.92.218.83)
  by mail.codesourcery.com with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 12 Jun 2004 01:08:13 -0000
Received: by taltos.codesourcery.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:08:13 -0700
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>,  DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>, 
 gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: PATCH to support native Windows builds
References: <200406112059.i5BKxnWv025590@sirius.codesourcery.com>
	<000401c4500b$dde17860$f96d65da@DANNY>
	<40CA4634.8010908@codesourcery.com>
	<200406120000.i5C00scH018826@greed.delorie.com>
	<40CA49D8.9000904@codesourcery.com> <m33c51pqky.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
	<87n0397gan.fsf@taltos.codesourcery.com>
	<m3y8mtoale.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
From: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 08:14:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <m3y8mtoale.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> (Ian Lance Taylor's message
 of
	"11 Jun 2004 20:59:09 -0400")
Message-ID: <87brjp7fcz.fsf@taltos.codesourcery.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00843.txt.bz2

Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com> writes:

> Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
>> I think you took my vague lack of enthusiasm for a rejection.  I'd be
>> fine with the second version of your patch.
>
> Actually, it was more like I thought your suggestion was good, and
> it's obviously a good idea to get the API right from the start, but I
> couldn't quite manage to push the work farther.

Fair enough.  I reread the old thread and decided I'd been too
ambitious - it's enough to get the mingwin-hosted-cross-compiler
working, let's not try to fix specs at the same time. :)

zw