From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de (Martin v. Löwis)
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, java@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Implementing Universal Character Names in identifiers
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 11:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bs59vyn5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <j4d6ppmxug.fsf@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
>>>>> "Martin" == Martin v Löwis <loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de> writes:
Martin> That sounds good. Are you currently making use of non-ASCII
Martin> identifiers anywhere? If not, would it be acceptable to not
Martin> provide them on platforms that lack assembler capabilities?
We don't use non-ascii identifiers in libgcj.
However, the ability to use these is part of the Java language
specification. So we have a strong preference for supporting them on
all platforms. We already do that by mangling the identifiers when we
see a non-ascii character.
We're only concerned with compatibility with g++ here. It doesn't
matter to us whether C does or does not mangle symbols on a given
platform.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-01 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-27 23:15 Martin v. Löwis
2002-10-27 23:47 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-10-28 0:11 ` Martin v. Löwis
2002-10-27 23:51 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-10-28 0:53 ` Martin v. Löwis
2002-10-28 1:30 ` Fergus Henderson
2002-10-28 2:26 ` Joseph S. Myers
2002-10-28 3:29 ` Martin v. Löwis
2002-10-28 10:39 ` Zack Weinberg
2002-10-28 10:53 ` Joseph S. Myers
2002-10-29 1:39 ` Martin v. Löwis
2002-10-29 12:04 ` Joseph S. Myers
2002-10-31 11:08 ` Tom Tromey
2002-11-01 1:41 ` Martin v. Löwis
2002-11-01 11:17 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2002-11-01 11:57 ` Martin v. Löwis
2002-11-01 14:56 ` Tom Tromey
2002-11-01 14:59 ` Andrew Pinski
2002-11-03 6:08 ` Martin v. Löwis
2002-11-03 6:05 ` Martin v. Löwis
2002-11-10 10:39 ` Neil Booth
2002-11-11 8:36 ` Martin v. Löwis
2002-11-07 0:09 ` Neil Booth
2002-11-07 0:12 ` Neil Booth
2002-11-07 1:01 ` Martin v. Löwis
2002-11-07 1:11 ` Neil Booth
2002-11-07 1:47 ` Martin v. Löwis
2002-11-07 11:40 ` Neil Booth
2002-11-08 3:51 ` Martin v. Löwis
2002-11-08 11:45 ` Neil Booth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bs59vyn5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=java@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=loewis@informatik.hu-berlin.de \
--cc=zack@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).