From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 499D5385E01F for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:35:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 499D5385E01F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 499D5385E01F Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701380159; cv=none; b=Q4jpqj5Tbd4OxlgN+GL9zLrjdomt//NzB2UaQ36eZJ4dW1AusNFGn9TSLXWRp5mVi5BdRwsKrAlaaENBppd6i/F4I7DHY3FWsm1JelGPWRqcyoX0ZltyhyITzmkGHslvNpCHnhdc0C4G6F+07iaEgyZfjNh1gKFeTzY4ct5cY4U= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1701380159; c=relaxed/simple; bh=D7SgdmRjSXBcSXpsgSLjTjQNmChnGuhJnyGJ+Hx/lxQ=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=chL3v2hOcvpM1bPONBOFdcgX69qSwwKklbid9jBtPZ3erdDxFc4qGP5JISKmUcBePyJ4goFB8o45jiwAdJGNkQkkhzdhUyxecWKOScaKl6Z+TX/S7TASUjJ8WPt15S3VYQsR/VtUaXkgRdNNxIPExjlbXC5tL5EUB/YtYYe66nE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1701380158; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0Q+AFJ/QC48juq5lOyjHr4O9av4OZgdKh44DgalXonE=; b=f3IT4eGieepIQZK5JNGhP5u6CJ2eyY5k0wfWWRYTgmr15KWDGjjlqRNrsY2DyIXwXYI8Y4 GxRXFka9aOFPKm7FK2pzQ2cZaM35PQ1rFSVp7yDh3h0dfu3AWggtBC6VGR5U6OZ9wiRpSS MxfnOPSnFcIdGK35n1sYgiMYNsmSjPI= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-648-zjmosC_1PoymvuADsZ1zxQ-1; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 16:35:53 -0500 X-MC-Unique: zjmosC_1PoymvuADsZ1zxQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61F4C80F82F; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.2.16.45]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD89F1C060AE; Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:35:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Sam James Cc: Jeff Law , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] : More warnings as errors by default References: <87bkbli8ke.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <874jh7oryp.fsf@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 22:35:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874jh7oryp.fsf@gentoo.org> (Sam James's message of "Mon, 27 Nov 2023 20:23:29 +0000") Message-ID: <87cyvqsz48.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.7 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * Sam James: >>> But give Marek additional time to chime in, particularly given the >>> holidays this week in the US. Say through this time next week? >> >> [...] >> >> I'm also gathering some numbers regarding autoconf impact and potential >> silent miscompilation. > > I'd actually forgot about another element here: FreeBSD 14 which was > just released now ships with Clang 16 so we seem to be getting some > activity from them which is a help. > > I've resumed our testing for configure diffs and am going to > focus on that for now. It's just laborious because of how many errors > are actually fine. Marek has kindly posted his reviews, and I'm incorporating his suggestions. Meanwhile, I've posted some numbers to the gcc list: Update on GCC 14 C type safety changes/warnings as errors Thanks, Florian