From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29881 invoked by alias); 18 May 2015 19:09:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29869 invoked by uid 89); 18 May 2015 19:09:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: fencepost.gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (208.118.235.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 18 May 2015 19:09:34 +0000 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:41429 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YuQPq-0007t1-Rt; Mon, 18 May 2015 15:09:31 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Ramana Radhakrishnan Cc: ramrad01@arm.com, gcc-patches , Richard Biener Subject: Re: [PATCH][ARM] PR/65711: Don't pass '-dynamic-linker' when '-shared' is used References: <87mw1zl035.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 29 =?utf-8?Q?Flor=C3=A9al?= an 223 de la =?utf-8?Q?R?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x3D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:48:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Ramana Radhakrishnan's message of "Mon, 18 May 2015 14:29:25 +0100") Message-ID: <87d21xog7s.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg01614.txt.bz2 Ramana Radhakrishnan skribis: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrot= e: >> As discussed at . >> >> Patch is for both 4.8 and 4.9 (possibly 5.1 too, I haven=E2=80=99t check= ed.) >> > > OK for trunk. This is also ok for all release branches if no > objections in 24 hours. OK, thank you. I haven=E2=80=99t applied for write-after-approval so perhaps you should co= mmit it yourself? Ludo=E2=80=99.