From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29CC53858CDA for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 22:00:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 29CC53858CDA Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id k22so11868004pfd.3 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 15:00:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aRgViTF6kSo+Qn6xtFwdqQNjs65Zld9UZMqVDXnpMFc=; b=j2m3WcfFxrODQ5EMnEdjtku5Xb00l9c241jG8BVynw7TvJQ4lFQL+Erf2QZg0oOwyF 74NKM9rXS5xLw/g1SI8k22qWEKylJmNLtwM/B8LCgaQHsFSzHkbD215m+m1jZrQmJbDI IVCFMigPpd/I17NXT+OR6PNVwmUcr1hVafc6MYn9HEKPL7N9P/7E36dhcA21QpjrTkgL KNfgKXASAohsabcqoI6AEKX8OqKFMvtLMjeBstGns+lcVUSX91oEuLeOsCmfHJRbHWIq ihnpZ7JxA5weCmY1Ga7ZbKLKEor3j5zrNe90uCyUSurUVNwRaHd6eozJc+Lf+vCva1d+ 2OIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aRgViTF6kSo+Qn6xtFwdqQNjs65Zld9UZMqVDXnpMFc=; b=7150583UnMAfWn+y2u6HJgxewZ8QeTVvV2idAKBw4QuXPxHuT4niDMjIRadAAlEYRS XRWdHiPPsfkNCV4iwVhm33fD3wlDNxRvTPRCCIbJKQ7HilaD6+fosy1h4pDetjMI9HR3 HwWnk3MSN/JvQin/ffNMdO50IsCSNSx33etCw7g0T7AkOPbJYam7dh6QSG0fYrPf4TcW P+SYzAFofu6FbAeXl9Xi4Rx8KyL93dsQ/gPZXYokJnV5Vxwc5iRCuIdyKFR9ltQcw2R+ dmksAUBRUUuQ0IWneNp/yR+TfOxOYXoBRATQRwuzFEMrZR9zPzjkq6qF4e/LJvGT0Vk0 1Hcg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf31t4AwSY8kTvgM1ZaeS8WVTSea0K3ybE/fkyKlMzvdsFwepffp HMuj2W/rvX8LMS4Q4GWLJdY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4Vlz/G0i6dN8eB5CY2TE/oNPRkCU82ibEIEJxDlStmAntUvv5hP0YaklU4y1HOXM2JtcaKYA== X-Received: by 2002:a65:6bd4:0:b0:443:94a1:429c with SMTP id e20-20020a656bd4000000b0044394a1429cmr14578739pgw.606.1667253651762; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 15:00:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2601:681:8600:13d0::f0a? ([2601:681:8600:13d0::f0a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l10-20020a170903120a00b0017b69f99321sm4920004plh.219.2022.10.31.15.00.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Oct 2022 15:00:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <87e80ca7-2d66-09b1-26e3-fe64c6553b28@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 16:00:49 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix RVV testcases. Content-Language: en-US To: juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, kito.cheng@gmail.com References: <20221031014022.250112-1-juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> From: Jeff Law In-Reply-To: <20221031014022.250112-1-juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 10/30/22 19:40, juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai wrote: > From: Ju-Zhe Zhong > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/abi-2.c: Change ilp32d to ilp32. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/abi-3.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/abi-4.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/abi-5.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/abi-6.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/abi-7.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/mov-1.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/mov-10.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/mov-11.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/mov-12.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/mov-13.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/mov-2.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/mov-3.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/mov-4.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/mov-5.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/mov-6.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/mov-7.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/mov-8.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/mov-9.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pragma-1.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/user-1.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/user-2.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/user-3.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/user-4.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/user-5.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/user-6.c: Ditto. > * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/vsetvl-1.c: Ditto. I'm pretty new to the RISC-V world, but don't some of the cases (particularly the abi-* tests) verify that the ABI specification does not override the arch specification WRT availability of types? Jeff