From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 113775 invoked by alias); 15 May 2017 20:41:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 113739 invoked by uid 89); 15 May 2017 20:41:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=frequent, H*f:sk:C552C18, D*comcast.net, H*i:sk:C552C18 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-out.m-online.net Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (HELO mail-out.m-online.net) (212.18.0.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 May 2017 20:41:10 +0000 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3wRXY23NQfz1qrFW; Mon, 15 May 2017 22:41:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan01.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3wRXY21F37z3hjJ2; Mon, 15 May 2017 22:41:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan01.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SVSKAVA7dJYK; Mon, 15 May 2017 22:41:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: WcqnzlNkS1xkfBCetl1/S7hFifds8ZW8etkwlLBr8M7epm833KyaTFY1fD4m84WL Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-0-60.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.0.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 15 May 2017 22:41:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3B6C82C4A44; Mon, 15 May 2017 22:41:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Mike Stump Cc: Richard Biener , NightStrike , Jeff Law , Jakub Jelinek , Bernhard Reutner-Fischer , David Malcolm , gcc-patches List , GCC Development Subject: Re: dejagnu version update? References: <1441916913-11547-1-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> <1441916913-11547-3-git-send-email-dmalcolm@redhat.com> <55F720E6.7020709@redhat.com> <4CB1399A-23A6-44F7-A25F-ECBD953E03A0@gmail.com> <55F74C3D.50504@redhat.com> <1442344899.32352.101.camel@surprise> <55F87A07.6010809@redhat.com> <5B7C7A4F-122E-4485-B3F7-15309B91B21E@gmail.com> <20170513102412.fgwlr6m7bdrrgt5n@nbbrfq.cc.univie.ac.at> <20170513103834.GQ1809@tucnak> <2adcbbaf-a469-46a3-2b8a-f708cde9b2b8@redhat.com> X-Yow: Is this "BOOZE"? Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 20:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Mike Stump's message of "Mon, 15 May 2017 12:17:57 -0700") Message-ID: <87efvpsviz.fsf@linux-m68k.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg01227.txt.bz2 On Mai 15 2017, Mike Stump wrote: > That said, a little surprising that SLE is lagging everyone else so > hard. DejaGnu doesn't exactly have frequent releases. Missing just one release can easily put you more than 5 years behind. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."