From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3500 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2013 20:33:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 3479 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Jan 2013 20:33:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f178.google.com) (74.125.82.178) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 20:33:16 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id x43so10153059wey.23 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:33:15 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.86.40 with SMTP id m8mr97610575wjz.24.1357590794962; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:33:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2.26.203.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s16sm14216980wii.0.2013.01.07.12.33.09 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:33:14 -0800 (PST) From: Richard Sandiford To: "Steve Ellcey " Mail-Followup-To: "Steve Ellcey " ,, rdsandiford@googlemail.com Cc: Subject: Re: [patch, mips] Change -mad to -mmad to match documentation References: <786b4481-9093-40bc-ae04-d3501a4a05ef@EXCHHUB01.MIPS.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 20:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <786b4481-9093-40bc-ae04-d3501a4a05ef@EXCHHUB01.MIPS.com> (Steve Ellcey's message of "Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:27:26 -0800") Message-ID: <87ehhw4ttn.fsf@talisman.default> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00352.txt.bz2 "Steve Ellcey " writes: > The MIPS documentation describes a -mmad (-mno-mad) flag, but it is incorrectly > implemented as -mad (-mno-ad) instead. This patch changes the implementation > to match the documentation. This means that users who are currently using the > -mad or -mno-ad flags would have to change. If we want we could leave -mad and > -mno-ad as aliases for -mmad and -mno-ad but I don't think that is necessary. > > If someone does think we should do allow -mad, please let me know. > > OK to checkin? OK, thanks. Looks like I introduced this in the TARGET_OPTINS -> .opt-file conversion. Richard