From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 517183858407; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:30:44 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 517183858407 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4H86kC2yQ9z1qxH6; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:30:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4H86kC2HZJz1qqkC; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:30:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id degWWD7BSila; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:30:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: F2vu+8/rBMDOQ6AVE3VMx6Fh7QHdAqEGAuLA5WwgFJbsbWybIpsz3vupArQ5wFv5 Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-171-122.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.171.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:30:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 679072C25A2; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:30:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , Tobias Burnus , Sandra Loosemore , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Andreas Tobler , fortran@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, Fortran] Revert to non-multilib-specific ISO_Fortran_binding.h References: <4c32e0e7-7156-835a-30b-ada8c4b4482d@pfeifer.com> <2de2f2b0-d221-acc1-79d4-554ee480c62@pfeifer.com> <87r1drkwzz.fsf@igel.home> <20210914152312.GX304296@tucnak> X-Yow: Is the EIGHTIES when they had ART DECO and GERALD McBOING-BOING lunch boxes?? Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:30:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210914152312.GX304296@tucnak> (Jakub Jelinek's message of "Tue, 14 Sep 2021 17:23:12 +0200") Message-ID: <87h7enkwda.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 15:30:45 -0000 On Sep 14 2021, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > But, wonder why it didn't work with the float.h include then, because > https://github.com/lattera/freebsd/blob/master/sys/x86/include/float.h > seems to define LDBL_MANT_DIG to 64, LDBL_MIN_EXP to (-16381) and > LDBL_MAX_EXP to 16384 and that case was handled in ISO_Fortran_binding.h. Doesn't gcc always use its own float.h? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."