public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de>
Cc: "Bernd Edlinger" <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>,
	"Jakub Jelinek" <jakub@redhat.com>,
	"GCC Patches" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"Tom Tromey" <tromey@redhat.com>,
	"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <lopezibanez@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] preprocessor/58580 - preprocessor goes OOM with warning for zero literals
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iot9qtff.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140124150532.GB396@x4> (Markus Trippelsdorf's message of "Fri,	24 Jan 2014 16:05:32 +0100")

Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@trippelsdorf.de> writes:

> On 2014.01.22 at 09:16 +0100, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> writes:
>> 
>> > Hi,
>> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> > since there was no progress in the last 2 months on that matter,
>> 
>> Sorry, this is my bad.  I got sidetracked by something else and forgot
>> that I had the patch working et al, and all its bits that need approval
>> got approved.  It still can go in right now.  It improves performance
>> and fixes the issue the way it was discussed.
>> 
>> Here it is, regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu against trunk.
>> 
>> If nobody objects in the next 24 hours, I'll commit it.
>
> The patch causes http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59935 .
> The follow-up patch (fp == NULL check) doesn't help.

I am looking into that, sorry for the inconvenience.

-- 
		Dodji

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-24 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-31 14:48 Bernd Edlinger
2013-10-31 15:06 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-10-31 15:19   ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-10-31 18:26     ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-04 11:52       ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-04 11:59         ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-04 15:42           ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-05  0:10             ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-05  9:50               ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-05 11:19                 ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-05 11:43                   ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-06 22:27                 ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-04 12:06         ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-04 12:15           ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-04 12:32             ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-04 15:21           ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-11 10:49       ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-11 14:35         ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-11 17:13           ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-12 16:42             ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-13  5:10               ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-13  9:40                 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-13  9:43                   ` Bernd Edlinger
2013-11-13  9:49                     ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-13  9:49                     ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-11-13  9:51               ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-11-14 15:12                 ` Dodji Seketeli
2013-12-09 20:11                   ` Tom Tromey
2014-01-21 12:28                   ` Bernd Edlinger
2014-01-22  8:16                     ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-23 17:12                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-01-24  2:58                         ` Bernd Edlinger
2014-01-24  7:53                         ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-24 15:05                       ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-01-24 15:41                         ` Dodji Seketeli [this message]
2014-01-24 15:44                           ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-01-24 16:09                             ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-24 16:13                               ` Jakub Jelinek
2014-01-24 23:02                               ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-01-24 23:20                                 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2014-01-28 13:20                                   ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-28 13:23                                     ` Dodji Seketeli
2014-01-28 18:40                                       ` H.J. Lu
2014-01-29 11:28                                         ` Dodji Seketeli
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-31 13:45 Dodji Seketeli
2013-10-31 17:30 ` Manuel López-Ibáñez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87iot9qtff.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=dodji@redhat.com \
    --cc=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=lopezibanez@gmail.com \
    --cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).