"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk> writes:

> On Sun, 23 Apr 2023, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
>> >  There are extra ICEs in regression testing and code quality is poor; cf. 
>> > <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/588296.html>.  
>> 
>> Do you have something you can show for this?  Maybe in a PR?
>
>  I have filed no PRs as I didn't assess the collateral damage at the time 
> I looked at it.  I only ran regression-testing with `-mlra' shortly after 
> I completed MODE_CC conversion and added the option, to see what lies 
> beyond.  And I only added `-mlra' and made minimal changes to make the 
> compiler build again just to make it easier to proceed towards LRA.

I think before moving forward with the plan in general, a PR is ideally
needed for each target anyway. Not all machine maintainers actively watch the
MLs.