From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=A+i5=BE=gentoo.org=sam@sourceware.org>
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D7F385771B
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 15 May 2023 21:17:08 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 32D7F385771B
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gentoo.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gentoo.org
References: <283c45ca085ced958cbce6e64331252c83a5899f.1682268126.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2304231942420.58739@angie.orcam.me.uk>
 <20230423203328.GL19790@gate.crashing.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2305152104010.11892@angie.orcam.me.uk>
User-agent: mu4e 1.10.3; emacs 29.0.91
From: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Turn on LRA on all targets
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 22:16:17 +0100
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2305152104010.11892@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Message-ID: <87jzx9i9bk.fsf@gentoo.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_SHORT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk> writes:

> On Sun, 23 Apr 2023, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
>> >  There are extra ICEs in regression testing and code quality is poor; =
cf.=20
>> > <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/588296.html>.=
=20=20
>>=20
>> Do you have something you can show for this?  Maybe in a PR?
>
>  I have filed no PRs as I didn't assess the collateral damage at the time=
=20
> I looked at it.  I only ran regression-testing with `-mlra' shortly after=
=20
> I completed MODE_CC conversion and added the option, to see what lies=20
> beyond.  And I only added `-mlra' and made minimal changes to make the=20
> compiler build again just to make it easier to proceed towards LRA.

I think before moving forward with the plan in general, a PR is ideally
needed for each target anyway. Not all machine maintainers actively watch t=
he
MLs.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iOUEARYKAI0WIQQlpruI3Zt2TGtVQcJzhAn1IN+RkAUCZGKhT18UgAAAAAAuAChp
c3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVucGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MjVB
NkJCODhERDlCNzY0QzZCNTU0MUMyNzM4NDA5RjUyMERGOTE5MA8cc2FtQGdlbnRv
by5vcmcACgkQc4QJ9SDfkZAbjwD9GTCnWoYhlCsa2I1y2TC37JBvyYL8NcoJyyFQ
8q4Tk64BALYBfoCAhKfEo7iau3L323VMjguZO2LDwTP1ar8YDdIN
=OtoB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--