From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-399426-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 103079 invoked by alias); 30 May 2015 15:54:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 103069 invoked by uid 89); 30 May 2015 15:54:15 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-out.m-online.net
Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (HELO mail-out.m-online.net) (212.18.0.9) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 30 May 2015 15:54:14 +0000
Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182])	by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3lzS4J6xnBz3hj8c;	Sat, 30 May 2015 17:54:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68])	by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3lzS4J3hLpzvh1r;	Sat, 30 May 2015 17:54:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182])	by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with ESMTP id 734thtGnzApe; Sat, 30 May 2015 17:54:07 +0200 (CEST)
X-Auth-Info: ZOEMaOsWpFFr5rZFLVsL5ub0Y7iVEJ39JipH5ecpbISdJaG1MkSNPfhNuuMJW/w0
Received: from igel.home (ppp-93-104-60-98.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.60.98])	by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA;	Sat, 30 May 2015 17:54:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000)	id 02E712C3883; Sat, 30 May 2015 17:54:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Earnshaw <richard.earnshaw@arm.com>,  Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com>,  Hans-Peter Nilsson <hans-peter.nilsson@axis.com>,  Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>,  Matthew Fortune <Matthew.Fortune@imgtec.com>,  David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,  "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,  Matt Thomas <matt@3am-software.com>,  Rainer Orth <ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>,  Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>,  GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,  "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: PING^3: [PATCH]: New configure options that make the compiler use -fPIE and -pie as default option
References: <CAMe9rOrw7OFObOmOCG1wM2Hfr_hpKo-wY0_17ngB89CTQ_34Mw@mail.gmail.com>	<alpine.DEB.2.10.1505072104300.20024@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>	<CAMe9rOrcADb1t2Ch0LDy9SOaS9RDoj4BGgo8qL+6jtg1tnLA8g@mail.gmail.com>	<3072346.CTCrhcXNep@laptop1.gw.ume.nu>	<alpine.DEB.2.10.1505190109380.16300@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>	<CAMe9rOr-mU-vxmF3po-zKAYtLyYGGCN4LeM-DJkL6Kv3fYxD_g@mail.gmail.com>	<alpine.DEB.2.10.1505191520110.32308@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>	<CAMe9rOqncLsJhb7Fhr3t3acDO+Kq38AeA+ac1TKt6oqWwGz-5Q@mail.gmail.com>	<alpine.DEB.2.10.1505191531440.32308@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>	<CAMe9rOrW1BGje8b6EmrzaJP8b0rPWF+WrTTWdAn-67Fn7-imqw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOpZow4w3zcycLoTb5LZdLKP2QWNpsU5oLMJCyZGUTd1fg@mail.gmail.com>	<87vbflkh05.fsf@igel.home> <87k2w1k54t.fsf@igel.home>	<CAMe9rOqUj4dhH3omFO7UONsPgmg9iOaXhntfK+dNByLeGnrm_Q@mail.gmail.com>	<87oal2ayo8.fsf@igel.home>	<CAMe9rOpu7dZ9PfsDmjVfO380w95b0iPuvkuxGRmnMM3YEAk11Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Yow: I'm in ATLANTIC CITY riding in a comfortable ROLLING CHAIR...
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 16:44:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOpu7dZ9PfsDmjVfO380w95b0iPuvkuxGRmnMM3YEAk11Q@mail.gmail.com>	(H. J. Lu's message of "Sat, 30 May 2015 08:42:38 -0700")
Message-ID: <87k2vqawo1.fsf@igel.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg02864.txt.bz2

"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:

> Starting GCC 4.6, the unrecognized option became an error.
> Before 4.6, it was ignored.  Does it cause any problems for
> bootstrap?

No, only spurious messages.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."