From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9398 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2015 22:25:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9374 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jan 2015 22:25:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,MEDICAL_SUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-we0-f181.google.com Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com (HELO mail-we0-f181.google.com) (74.125.82.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:25:29 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id q58so21743160wes.12 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:25:26 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.194.191.227 with SMTP id hb3mr34503766wjc.79.1421101526115; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:25:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([95.144.14.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ck7sm23288799wjb.13.2015.01.12.14.25.25 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 14:25:25 -0800 (PST) From: Richard Sandiford To: James Greenhalgh Mail-Followup-To: James Greenhalgh ,gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gerald@pfeifer.com, joseph@codesourcery.com, rdsandiford@googlemail.com Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gerald@pfeifer.com, joseph@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: [Patch docs 2/5] Update "Instruction Patterns" in md.texi References: <1420543302-11008-1-git-send-email-james.greenhalgh@arm.com> <1420543302-11008-3-git-send-email-james.greenhalgh@arm.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:31:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1420543302-11008-3-git-send-email-james.greenhalgh@arm.com> (James Greenhalgh's message of "Tue, 6 Jan 2015 11:21:39 +0000") Message-ID: <87lhl78wmi.fsf@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg00770.txt.bz2 James Greenhalgh writes: > @node Example > @section Example of @code{define_insn} > @cindex @code{define_insn} example > > -Here is an actual example of an instruction pattern, for the 68000/68020. > +Here is an example of an instruction pattern, taken from the machine > +description for the 68000/68020. > > @smallexample > (define_insn "tstsi" Might be mission creep again, but: tstsi is no longer a named pattern. Maybe we should put something more modern in there... Thanks, Richard