From: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>
To: Andrew Bennett <Andrew.Bennett@imgtec.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches\@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Matthew Fortune <Matthew.Fortune@imgtec.com>,
Saeed Ghazanfar <Saeed.Ghazanfar@imgtec.com>,
Rich Fuhler <Rich.Fuhler@imgtec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for MIPS r3 and r5
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 19:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mwes2hqe.fsf@talisman.default> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0DA23CC379F5F945ACB41CF394B98277578C80@LEMAIL01.le.imgtec.org> (Andrew Bennett's message of "Thu, 8 May 2014 13:47:33 +0000")
Andrew Bennett <Andrew.Bennett@imgtec.com> writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/mips-cpus.def b/gcc/config/mips/mips-cpus.def
> index 07fbf9c..f2e23c6 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/mips/mips-cpus.def
> +++ b/gcc/config/mips/mips-cpus.def
> @@ -44,9 +44,13 @@ MIPS_CPU ("mips4", PROCESSOR_R8000, 4, 0)
> isn't tuned to a specific processor. */
> MIPS_CPU ("mips32", PROCESSOR_4KC, 32, PTF_AVOID_BRANCHLIKELY)
> MIPS_CPU ("mips32r2", PROCESSOR_74KF2_1, 33, PTF_AVOID_BRANCHLIKELY)
> +MIPS_CPU ("mips32r3", PROCESSOR_M4K, 34, PTF_AVOID_BRANCHLIKELY)
> +MIPS_CPU ("mips32r5", PROCESSOR_74KF2_1, 36, PTF_AVOID_BRANCHLIKELY)
Looks odd for mips32r2 and mips32r5 to have the same processor tuning
but mips32r3 to be different. I assume 74KF2_1 is just a reasonable
default, given the lack of tuning for a real r5 CPU? That's fine if so,
but probably deserves a comment.
> MIPS_CPU ("mips64", PROCESSOR_5KC, 64, PTF_AVOID_BRANCHLIKELY)
> /* ??? For now just tune the generic MIPS64r2 for 5KC as well. */
> MIPS_CPU ("mips64r2", PROCESSOR_5KC, 65, PTF_AVOID_BRANCHLIKELY)
> +MIPS_CPU ("mips64r3", PROCESSOR_5KC, 66, PTF_AVOID_BRANCHLIKELY)
> +MIPS_CPU ("mips64r5", PROCESSOR_5KC, 68, PTF_AVOID_BRANCHLIKELY)
Now "MIPS64r2 and above".
> @@ -724,7 +752,7 @@ struct mips_cpu_info {
> /* Infer a -msynci setting from a -mips argument, on the assumption that
> -msynci is desired where possible. */
> #define MIPS_ISA_SYNCI_SPEC \
> - "%{msynci|mno-synci:;:%{mips32r2|mips64r2:-msynci;:-mno-synci}}"
> + "%{msynci|mno-synci:;:%{mips32r2|mips32r3|mips32r5|mips64r2|mips64r3|mips64r5:-msynci;:-mno-synci}}"
Please split the line to stay within 80 chars.
> @@ -141,7 +151,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
> "%{EL:-m elf32lmip} \
> %{EB:-m elf32bmip} \
> %(endian_spec) \
> - %{G*} %{mips1} %{mips2} %{mips3} %{mips4} %{mips32} %{mips32r2} %{mips64} \
> + %{G*} %{mips1} %{mips2} %{mips3} %{mips4} %{mips32} %{mips32r2} \
> + %{mips32r3} %{mips32r5} %{mips64} \
> %(netbsd_link_spec)"
>
> #define NETBSD_ENTRY_POINT "__start"
Not sure the omission of mips64r2 was deliberate here, or in vxworks.h.
As Joseph said, the .po stuff should be left alone. The .pot file is
regenerated near to a release so that the translators can update the
.po files.
Looks good otherwise, thanks.
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-08 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-08 13:47 Andrew Bennett
2014-05-08 17:23 ` Joseph S. Myers
2014-05-08 19:27 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2014-05-09 10:40 ` Andrew Bennett
2014-05-09 11:07 ` Richard Sandiford
2014-05-09 11:26 ` Andrew Bennett
2014-05-10 9:16 ` Richard Sandiford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mwes2hqe.fsf@talisman.default \
--to=rdsandiford@googlemail.com \
--cc=Andrew.Bennett@imgtec.com \
--cc=Matthew.Fortune@imgtec.com \
--cc=Rich.Fuhler@imgtec.com \
--cc=Saeed.Ghazanfar@imgtec.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).