From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-201195-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13258 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2007 01:47:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 12581 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Aug 2007 01:47:32 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mailhost.cs.tamu.edu (HELO postal.cs.tamu.edu) (128.194.138.100)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:47:30 +0000
Received: from soliton.cs.tamu.edu (vpn-33.cs.tamu.edu [128.194.150.33]) 	by postal.cs.tamu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508E646DE04; 	Thu,  9 Aug 2007 20:47:29 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by soliton.cs.tamu.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) 	id 454F71AAEB; Thu,  9 Aug 2007 20:52:59 -0500 (CDT)
To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
Cc: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>,  gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Add a __nowarn__ keyword
References: <46B9F0B5.1080302@gnu.org> 	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0708081517560.25407@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> 	<xnfy2toldl.fsf@greed.delorie.com> 	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0708081837320.25805@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> 	<200708082254.l78MsIC8014802@greed.delorie.com> 	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0708082227420.26657@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>
From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@cs.tamu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0708082227420.26657@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:47:00 -0000
Message-ID: <87myx088as.fsf@soliton.cs.tamu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00629.txt.bz2

"Kaveh R. GHAZI" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:


[...]

| Still my preference is to go with the original union-hack and avoid this
| altogether. :-)

I have a preference for avoiding the __nowarn__ extension.

-- Gaby