From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18167 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2004 20:34:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18156 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2004 20:34:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.9) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2004 20:34:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 3218 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2004 20:34:35 -0000 Received: from taltos.codesourcery.com (zack@66.92.218.83) by mail.codesourcery.com with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 16 Aug 2004 20:34:35 -0000 Received: by taltos.codesourcery.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:34:35 -0700 To: Mark Mitchell Cc: Ziemowit Laski , GCC Patches Subject: Re: References: <918394DF-EFB7-11D8-8323-000393673036@apple.com> <41211767.7090409@codesourcery.com> From: Zack Weinberg Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <41211767.7090409@codesourcery.com> (Mark Mitchell's message of "Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:21:59 -0700") Message-ID: <87n00u6cv8.fsf@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg01118.txt.bz2 Mark Mitchell writes: > You might want to try to make a deal with Zack whereby he will commit to > reviewing the patches, if you will break them up, so that you know that > you will at least be assured of getting a review if you do the work of > breaking it up. I have no idea whether Zack would agree to that deal or > not, though; that is up to him. Part of why I'm asking for it to be broken up is, I feel competent to review changes to the C front end, but not to expr.c. I am willing to commit to reviewing changes that touch only the C front end, if properly broken up and explained. zw