public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>, <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch][v5] libgomp/nvptx: Prepare for reverse-offload callback handling
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 21:11:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7u1ox4n.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87r0yxoxdh.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net>

Hi Tobias!

On 2022-10-24T21:05:46+0200, I wrote:
> On 2022-10-24T16:07:25+0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 10:55:26AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>> libgomp/nvptx: Prepare for reverse-offload callback handling
>
>> Ok, thanks.
>
> Per commit r13-3460-g131d18e928a3ea1ab2d3bf61aa92d68a8a254609
> "libgomp/nvptx: Prepare for reverse-offload callback handling",
> I'm seeing a lot of libgomp execution test regressions.  Random
> example, 'libgomp.c-c++-common/error-1.c':
>
>     [...]
>       GOMP_OFFLOAD_run: kernel main$_omp_fn$0: launch [(teams: 1), 1, 1] [(lanes: 32), (threads: 8), 1]
>
>     Thread 1 "a.out" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>     0x00007ffff793b87d in GOMP_OFFLOAD_run (ord=<optimized out>, tgt_fn=<optimized out>, tgt_vars=<optimized out>, args=<optimized out>) at [...]/source-gcc/libgomp/plugin/plugin-nvptx.c:2127
>     2127            if (__atomic_load_n (&ptx_dev->rev_data->fn, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) != 0)
>     (gdb) print ptx_dev
>     $1 = (struct ptx_device *) 0x6a55a0
>     (gdb) print ptx_dev->rev_data
>     $2 = (struct rev_offload *) 0xffffffff00000000
>     (gdb) print ptx_dev->rev_data->fn
>     Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffff00000000
>
> Why is it even taking this 'if (reverse_offload)' code path, which isn't
> applicable to this test case (as far as I understand)?  (Well, the answer
> is 'bool reverse_offload = ptx_dev->rev_data != NULL;', but why is that?)

Well.

    --- a/libgomp/plugin/plugin-nvptx.c
    +++ b/libgomp/plugin/plugin-nvptx.c

    @@ -329,6 +332,7 @@ struct ptx_device
           pthread_mutex_t lock;
         } omp_stacks;

    +  struct rev_offload *rev_data;
       struct ptx_device *next;
     };

... but as far as I can tell, this is never initialized in
'nvptx_open_device', which does 'ptx_dev = GOMP_PLUGIN_malloc ([...]);'.
Would the following be the correct fix (currently testing)?

    --- libgomp/plugin/plugin-nvptx.c
    +++ libgomp/plugin/plugin-nvptx.c
    @@ -546,6 +546,8 @@ nvptx_open_device (int n)
       ptx_dev->omp_stacks.size = 0;
       pthread_mutex_init (&ptx_dev->omp_stacks.lock, NULL);

    +  ptx_dev->rev_data = NULL;
    +
       return ptx_dev;
     }



Grüße
 Thomas
-----------------
Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht München, HRB 106955

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-24 19:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-26  9:07 [Patch] " Tobias Burnus
2022-08-26  9:07 ` Tobias Burnus
2022-08-26 14:56 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-09-09 15:49   ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-09-09 15:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-09-13  7:07 ` Tobias Burnus
2022-09-21 20:06   ` Alexander Monakov
2022-09-26 15:07     ` Tobias Burnus
2022-09-26 17:45       ` Alexander Monakov
2022-09-27  9:23         ` Tobias Burnus
2022-09-28 13:16           ` Alexander Monakov
2022-10-02 18:13           ` Tobias Burnus
2022-10-07 14:26             ` [Patch][v5] " Tobias Burnus
2022-10-11 10:49               ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-11 11:12                 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-10-12  8:55                   ` Tobias Burnus
2022-10-17  7:35                     ` *ping* / " Tobias Burnus
2022-10-19 15:53                     ` Alexander Monakov
2022-10-24 14:07                     ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-24 19:05                       ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-10-24 19:11                         ` Thomas Schwinge [this message]
2022-10-24 19:46                           ` Tobias Burnus
2022-10-24 19:51                           ` libgomp/nvptx: Prepare for reverse-offload callback handling, resolve spurious SIGSEGVs (was: [Patch][v5] libgomp/nvptx: Prepare for reverse-offload callback handling) Thomas Schwinge
2023-03-21 15:53 ` libgomp: Simplify OpenMP reverse offload host <-> device memory copy implementation (was: [Patch] " Thomas Schwinge
2023-03-24 15:43   ` [og12] " Thomas Schwinge
2023-04-28  8:48   ` Tobias Burnus
2023-04-28  9:31     ` Thomas Schwinge
2023-04-28 10:51       ` Tobias Burnus
2023-04-04 14:40 ` [Patch] libgomp/nvptx: Prepare for reverse-offload callback handling Thomas Schwinge
2023-04-28  8:28   ` Tobias Burnus
2023-04-28  9:23     ` Thomas Schwinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o7u1ox4n.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net \
    --to=thomas@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=tobias@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).