public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,  hp@bitrange.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add atomic type qualifier
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 19:24:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ob9pm9gt.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51F2AEB1.60408@redhat.com> (Andrew MacLeod's message of "Fri, 26	Jul 2013 13:15:29 -0400")

Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com> writes:
>
> What it doesn't do:
>   * It doesn't implement the C11 expression expansion into atomic
> built-ins.  ie, you can't write:
> _Atomic int x;
>  x = 0;
>       and have the result be an atomic operation calling
> __atomic_store (&x, 0).   

How would this work if you want a different memory order?

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-26 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-26 17:18 Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-26 19:24 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2013-07-26 19:34   ` Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-26 21:14     ` Andi Kleen
2013-07-26 22:29       ` Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-26 20:42 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2013-07-26 23:58 ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-07-27  1:15   ` Andrew MacLeod
2013-08-01 21:54   ` Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-28 21:15 ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-07-29 15:47   ` Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-29 16:12     ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-07-29 16:30       ` Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-29 16:48         ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-07-29 18:20           ` Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-29 23:24       ` Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-30 12:03         ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-07-30 12:38           ` Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-30 13:25             ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-07-30 13:58               ` Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-31 12:19                 ` Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-29 16:24     ` Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-30 16:56 ` [PATCH 0/5] Atomic " Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-30 17:13   ` [PATCH 2/5] Atomic type qualifier - Add atomic type to tree node Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-30 17:14   ` [PATCH 3/5] Atomic type qualifier - front end changes Andrew MacLeod
2013-08-09  0:06     ` Joseph S. Myers
2013-07-30 17:14   ` [PATCH 4/5] Atomic type qualifier - Change built-in function types Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-30 17:14   ` [PATCH 1/5] Atomic type qualifier - Add type alignment override hook Andrew MacLeod
2013-07-30 17:32   ` [PATCH 5/5] Atomic type qualifier - Use atomic objects Andrew MacLeod
2013-08-02 19:22   ` [PATCH] - C11 expressions and stdatomic.h - Just for current state Andrew MacLeod
2013-08-07 23:06     ` Joseph S. Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ob9pm9gt.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hp@bitrange.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).