* [PATCH] PR c++/55311 - Cannot specialize alias template with arg of type array of char
@ 2012-12-22 16:04 Dodji Seketeli
2012-12-24 5:38 ` Jason Merrill
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dodji Seketeli @ 2012-12-22 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Patches; +Cc: Jason Merrill
Hello,
Consider this test case:
1 template <const char *const C, typename T>
2 struct A
3 {};
4
5 struct B {};
6
7 extern constexpr char HELLO_WORLD[] = "hello world";
8
9 A<HELLO_WORLD, B> g; // <-- This works fine
10
11 template <typename T>
12 using PartiallySpecialized = A<HELLO_WORLD, T>; // <-- This fails
13
At line 12 G++ fails to instantiate the alias template that has a
string variable initialized with a string literal, with the error
message:
test.cc:12:46: error: ‘"hello world"’ is not a valid template argument of type ‘const char*’ because ‘"hello world"’ is not a variable
using PartiallySpecialized = A<HELLO_WORLD, T>; // <-- This fails
^
Note that instantiating the template A at line 9 with the same
arguments as in the problematic case above works.
This happens in the context of lookup_template_class_1, when it handles
the alias template instantiation A<HELLO_WORLD, T> and thus passes the
VAR_DECL for HELLO_WORLD to convert_nontype_argument.
Note that from there decay_conversion replaces the the VAR_DECL with
its STRING_CST initializer[1]. Latter on, convert_nontype_argument
checks that the HELLO_WORLD constant it received as argument was
indeed a VAR_DECL:
else
{
tree decl;
decl = ((TREE_CODE (expr) == ADDR_EXPR)
? TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0) : expr);
if (TREE_CODE (decl) != VAR_DECL)
{
error ("%qE is not a valid template argument of type %qT "
"because %qE is not a variable",
expr, type, decl);
return NULL_TREE;
}
But the issue is, that VAR_DECL has been replaced by STRING_CST, so
the last 'if' above fails.
The idea of the patch I am proposing is to do the test above on the
argument received by convert_nontype_argument rather than on its
modified (decayed?) form.
[1]: The relacement of the VAR_DECL by its initializer is done by
decay_conversion by callig decl_constant_value_safe. That replacement
doesn't happen if processing_template_decl is not set. That's why it
doesn't happen for the class template instantiation at line 9, leading
to no error message there.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu against trunk.
gcc/cp/
PR c++/55311
* pt.c (convert_nontype_argument<array arguments>): Perform the
sanity tests on the initial expression otherwise decay_conversion
might have made us loose some information.
gcc/testsuite/
PR c++/55311
* g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-30.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/pt.c | 8 ++++----
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-30.C | 15 +++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-30.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index 1b3f039..4af30cf 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -5454,7 +5454,7 @@ unify_overload_resolution_failure (bool explain_p, tree arg)
static tree
convert_nontype_argument (tree type, tree expr, tsubst_flags_t complain)
{
- tree expr_type;
+ tree expr_type, initial_expr = expr;
/* Detect immediately string literals as invalid non-type argument.
This special-case is not needed for correctness (we would easily
@@ -5658,10 +5658,10 @@ convert_nontype_argument (tree type, tree expr, tsubst_flags_t complain)
}
else
{
- tree decl;
+ tree decl = STRIP_NOPS (initial_expr);
- decl = ((TREE_CODE (expr) == ADDR_EXPR)
- ? TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0) : expr);
+ decl = ((TREE_CODE (initial_expr) == ADDR_EXPR)
+ ? TREE_OPERAND (initial_expr, 0) : initial_expr);
if (TREE_CODE (decl) != VAR_DECL)
{
error ("%qE is not a valid template argument of type %qT "
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-30.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-30.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7ad5e6d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-30.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// Origin PR c++/55311
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <const char *const C, typename T>
+struct A
+{};
+
+struct B {};
+
+extern constexpr char HELLO_WORLD[] = "hello world";
+
+A<HELLO_WORLD, B> g; // <-- This works fine
+
+template <typename T>
+using PartiallySpecialized = A<HELLO_WORLD, T>; // <-- This fails
--
Dodji
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PR c++/55311 - Cannot specialize alias template with arg of type array of char
2012-12-22 16:04 [PATCH] PR c++/55311 - Cannot specialize alias template with arg of type array of char Dodji Seketeli
@ 2012-12-24 5:38 ` Jason Merrill
2012-12-24 14:23 ` Dodji Seketeli
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 2012-12-24 5:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dodji Seketeli; +Cc: GCC Patches
On 12/22/2012 11:03 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> [1]: The relacement of the VAR_DECL by its initializer is done by
> decay_conversion by callig decl_constant_value_safe. That replacement
> doesn't happen if processing_template_decl is not set. That's why it
> doesn't happen for the class template instantiation at line 9, leading
> to no error message there.
This is the bug. decay_conversion on an array should take the address,
not return the initializer.
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PR c++/55311 - Cannot specialize alias template with arg of type array of char
2012-12-24 5:38 ` Jason Merrill
@ 2012-12-24 14:23 ` Dodji Seketeli
2012-12-26 18:54 ` Jason Merrill
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dodji Seketeli @ 2012-12-24 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Merrill; +Cc: GCC Patches
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:
> On 12/22/2012 11:03 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
>> [1]: The relacement of the VAR_DECL by its initializer is done by
>> decay_conversion by callig decl_constant_value_safe. That replacement
>> doesn't happen if processing_template_decl is not set. That's why it
>> doesn't happen for the class template instantiation at line 9, leading
>> to no error message there.
>
> This is the bug. decay_conversion on an array should take the
> address, not return the initializer.
Right. So would something like this be acceptable then?
gcc/cp/
PR c++/55311
* pt.c (decay_conversion): Do not return the initializer of an array.
gcc/testsuite/
PR c++/55311
* g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-30.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/typeck.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-30.C | 15 +++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-30.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.c b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
index ef76dcd..3fa913d 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c
@@ -1880,19 +1880,25 @@ decay_conversion (tree exp, tsubst_flags_t complain)
return error_mark_node;
}
- /* FIXME remove? at least need to remember that this isn't really a
- constant expression if EXP isn't decl_constant_var_p, like with
- C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR. */
- exp = decl_constant_value_safe (exp);
- if (error_operand_p (exp))
- return error_mark_node;
+ code = TREE_CODE (type);
+
+ /* For and array decl decay_conversion should not try to return its
+ initializer. */
+ if (code != ARRAY_TYPE)
+ {
+ /* FIXME remove? at least need to remember that this isn't really a
+ constant expression if EXP isn't decl_constant_var_p, like with
+ C_MAYBE_CONST_EXPR. */
+ exp = decl_constant_value_safe (exp);
+ if (error_operand_p (exp))
+ return error_mark_node;
+ }
if (NULLPTR_TYPE_P (type) && !TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (exp))
return nullptr_node;
/* build_c_cast puts on a NOP_EXPR to make the result not an lvalue.
Leave such NOP_EXPRs, since RHS is being used in non-lvalue context. */
- code = TREE_CODE (type);
if (code == VOID_TYPE)
{
if (complain & tf_error)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-30.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-30.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7ad5e6d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-30.C
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// Origin PR c++/55311
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <const char *const C, typename T>
+struct A
+{};
+
+struct B {};
+
+extern constexpr char HELLO_WORLD[] = "hello world";
+
+A<HELLO_WORLD, B> g; // <-- This works fine
+
+template <typename T>
+using PartiallySpecialized = A<HELLO_WORLD, T>; // <-- This fails
--
Dodji
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] PR c++/55311 - Cannot specialize alias template with arg of type array of char
2012-12-24 14:23 ` Dodji Seketeli
@ 2012-12-26 18:54 ` Jason Merrill
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 2012-12-26 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dodji Seketeli; +Cc: GCC Patches
On 12/24/2012 09:23 AM, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> + /* For and array decl decay_conversion should not try to return its
"an array..."
OK with that change.
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-26 18:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-12-22 16:04 [PATCH] PR c++/55311 - Cannot specialize alias template with arg of type array of char Dodji Seketeli
2012-12-24 5:38 ` Jason Merrill
2012-12-24 14:23 ` Dodji Seketeli
2012-12-26 18:54 ` Jason Merrill
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).