* [r14-5930 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -Os (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
@ 2023-11-28 23:19 haochen.jiang
2023-11-29 6:51 ` Jose E. Marchesi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: haochen.jiang @ 2023-11-28 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jose.marchesi, gcc-regression, gcc-patches, haochen.jiang
On Linux/x86_64,
f31a019d1161ec78846473da743aedf49cca8c27 is the first bad commit
commit f31a019d1161ec78846473da743aedf49cca8c27
Author: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Date: Fri Nov 24 06:30:28 2023 +0100
Emit funcall external declarations only if actually used.
caused
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -Os (test for excess errors)
with GCC configured with
../../gcc/configure --prefix=/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/master/master/r14-5930/usr --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl --enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap
To reproduce:
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="compile.exp=gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c --target_board='unix{-m32}'"
$ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="compile.exp=gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c --target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=cascadelake}'"
(Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact me at haochen dot jiang at intel.com.)
(If you met problems with cascadelake related, disabling AVX512F in command line might save that.)
(However, please make sure that there is no potential problems with AVX512.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [r14-5930 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -Os (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
2023-11-28 23:19 [r14-5930 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -Os (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64 haochen.jiang
@ 2023-11-29 6:51 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-11-29 7:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jose E. Marchesi @ 2023-11-29 6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: haochen.jiang; +Cc: gcc-regression, gcc-patches, haochen.jiang
> On Linux/x86_64,
>
> f31a019d1161ec78846473da743aedf49cca8c27 is the first bad commit
> commit f31a019d1161ec78846473da743aedf49cca8c27
> Author: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
> Date: Fri Nov 24 06:30:28 2023 +0100
>
> Emit funcall external declarations only if actually used.
>
> caused
>
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O2 -flto
> -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
> -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -Os (test for excess errors)
Sorry about the regression.
I installed the patch below to skip the test if the target is not x86_64
in lp64, as obvious. This should fix the issue.
From 4ed0740c6e807460ce79a351094329fdeb551545 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:44:59 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: fix gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c in -m32
This test relies on having __int128 in x86_64 targets, which is only
available in -m64.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
* gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c: Skip test in -m32.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
index b33944c83ff..9b889172025 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
indirect calls. */
/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* __int128 is not supported in x86 -m32. */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! { x86_64-*-* && { ! ilp32 } } } } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -mcmodel=large" { target x86_64-*-* } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "globl\t__divti3" } } */
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [r14-5930 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -Os (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
2023-11-29 6:51 ` Jose E. Marchesi
@ 2023-11-29 7:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-11-29 8:20 ` Jose E. Marchesi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2023-11-29 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jose E. Marchesi
Cc: haochen.jiang, gcc-regression, gcc-patches, haochen.jiang
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 07:51:15AM +0100, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O2 -flto
> > -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
> > -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -Os (test for excess errors)
>
> Sorry about the regression.
>
> I installed the patch below to skip the test if the target is not x86_64
> in lp64, as obvious. This should fix the issue.
>
> >From 4ed0740c6e807460ce79a351094329fdeb551545 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:44:59 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: fix gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c in -m32
>
> This test relies on having __int128 in x86_64 targets, which is only
> available in -m64.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>
> * gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c: Skip test in -m32.
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
> index b33944c83ff..9b889172025 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
> indirect calls. */
>
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* __int128 is not supported in x86 -m32. */
> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! { x86_64-*-* && { ! ilp32 } } } } */
> /* { dg-options "-O2 -mcmodel=large" { target x86_64-*-* } } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "globl\t__divti3" } } */
This is not correct.
When a test uses __int128, it should be guarded with int128 effective
target.
But, as the test doesn't really test anything on non-x86 nor ia32,
it doesn't belong to gcc.c-torture/compile/ at all, it is x86 specific
test which should be moved to gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c
And, should have
/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -mcmodel=large" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "globl\t__divti3" } } */
I guess no need to bother with the extra guard for -mcmodel=large,
because -m32/-mx32 don't have __int128 support, and x86_64-*-*
is incorrect anyway (because with that target one can have all
of -m32/-m64/-mx32).
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [r14-5930 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -Os (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
2023-11-29 7:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
@ 2023-11-29 8:20 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-11-29 8:22 ` Jakub Jelinek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jose E. Marchesi @ 2023-11-29 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: haochen.jiang, gcc-regression, gcc-patches, haochen.jiang
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 07:51:15AM +0100, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
>> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O2 -flto
>> > -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none (test for excess errors)
>> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
>> > -fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
>> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
>> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
>> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -Os (test for excess errors)
>>
>> Sorry about the regression.
>>
>> I installed the patch below to skip the test if the target is not x86_64
>> in lp64, as obvious. This should fix the issue.
>>
>> >From 4ed0740c6e807460ce79a351094329fdeb551545 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
>> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 07:44:59 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: fix gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c in -m32
>>
>> This test relies on having __int128 in x86_64 targets, which is only
>> available in -m64.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>>
>> * gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c: Skip test in -m32.
>> ---
>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
>> index b33944c83ff..9b889172025 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
>> @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
>> indirect calls. */
>>
>> /* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* __int128 is not supported in x86 -m32. */
>> +/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! { x86_64-*-* && { ! ilp32 } } } } */
>> /* { dg-options "-O2 -mcmodel=large" { target x86_64-*-* } } */
>> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "globl\t__divti3" } } */
>
> This is not correct.
> When a test uses __int128, it should be guarded with int128 effective
> target.
> But, as the test doesn't really test anything on non-x86 nor ia32,
> it doesn't belong to gcc.c-torture/compile/ at all, it is x86 specific
> test which should be moved to gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c
> And, should have
> /* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
> /* { dg-options "-O2 -mcmodel=large" } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "globl\t__divti3" } } */
> I guess no need to bother with the extra guard for -mcmodel=large,
> because -m32/-mx32 don't have __int128 support, and x86_64-*-*
> is incorrect anyway (because with that target one can have all
> of -m32/-m64/-mx32).
OK to the patch below?
From a697f9e9442d96d3eda228b825dd8e8e06206c03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:16:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: move gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c to
gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c
This patch relocates a test that is really x86 specific, and changes
it to use check_effective_target_int128.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
* gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c: Remove.
* gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c: Moved from
gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c and adapted to use
effective-target for int128_t.
---
.../compile/libcall-2.c => gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c} | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
rename gcc/testsuite/{gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c => gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c} (50%)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c
similarity index 50%
rename from gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
rename to gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c
index 9b889172025..8bd6684a925 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c
@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
/* Make sure that external refences for libcalls are generated even for
indirect calls. */
-/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* __int128 is not supported in x86 -m32. */
-/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! { x86_64-*-* && { ! ilp32 } } } } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -mcmodel=large" { target x86_64-*-* } } */
+/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mcmodel=large" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "globl\t__divti3" } } */
__int128 a, b; void foo () { a = a / b; }
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [r14-5930 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -Os (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
2023-11-29 8:20 ` Jose E. Marchesi
@ 2023-11-29 8:22 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-11-29 8:32 ` Jose E. Marchesi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2023-11-29 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jose E. Marchesi
Cc: haochen.jiang, gcc-regression, gcc-patches, haochen.jiang
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 09:20:55AM +0100, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> OK to the patch below?
>
> >From a697f9e9442d96d3eda228b825dd8e8e06206c03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:16:48 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: move gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c to
> gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c
>
> This patch relocates a test that is really x86 specific, and changes
> it to use check_effective_target_int128.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>
> * gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c: Remove.
> * gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c: Moved from
> gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c and adapted to use
> effective-target for int128_t.
Yes.
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c
> similarity index 50%
> rename from gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
> rename to gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c
> index 9b889172025..8bd6684a925 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c
> @@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
> /* Make sure that external refences for libcalls are generated even for
> indirect calls. */
>
> -/* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* __int128 is not supported in x86 -m32. */
> -/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! { x86_64-*-* && { ! ilp32 } } } } */
> -/* { dg-options "-O2 -mcmodel=large" { target x86_64-*-* } } */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mcmodel=large" } */
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "globl\t__divti3" } } */
>
> __int128 a, b; void foo () { a = a / b; }
> --
> 2.30.2
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [r14-5930 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -Os (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
2023-11-29 8:22 ` Jakub Jelinek
@ 2023-11-29 8:32 ` Jose E. Marchesi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jose E. Marchesi @ 2023-11-29 8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: haochen.jiang, gcc-regression, gcc-patches, haochen.jiang
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 09:20:55AM +0100, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
>> OK to the patch below?
>>
>> >From a697f9e9442d96d3eda228b825dd8e8e06206c03 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
>> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 09:16:48 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: move gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c to
>> gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c
>>
>> This patch relocates a test that is really x86 specific, and changes
>> it to use check_effective_target_int128.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>>
>> * gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c: Remove.
>> * gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c: Moved from
>> gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c and adapted to use
>> effective-target for int128_t.
>
> Yes.
Thanks. Pushed.
>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c
>> similarity index 50%
>> rename from gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
>> rename to gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c
>> index 9b889172025..8bd6684a925 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c
>> @@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
>> /* Make sure that external refences for libcalls are generated even for
>> indirect calls. */
>>
>> -/* { dg-do compile } */
>> -/* __int128 is not supported in x86 -m32. */
>> -/* { dg-skip-if "" { ! { x86_64-*-* && { ! ilp32 } } } } */
>> -/* { dg-options "-O2 -mcmodel=large" { target x86_64-*-* } } */
>> +/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mcmodel=large" } */
>> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "globl\t__divti3" } } */
>>
>> __int128 a, b; void foo () { a = a / b; }
>> --
>> 2.30.2
>
> Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [r14-5930 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -Os (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
@ 2023-12-01 13:55 FX Coudert
2023-12-01 14:38 ` Iain Sandoe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: FX Coudert @ 2023-12-01 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: GCC Patches; +Cc: Jakub Jelinek, jose.marchesi, Iain Sandoe
That commit makes gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c on darwin:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c scan-assembler globl\t__divti3
because the pattern is not found, the only mention of divti3 in the generated assembly is:
LCFI0:
movabsq $_b@GOTOFF, %rdx
movabsq $___divti3@PLTOFF, %rax
leaq L2(%rip), %r15
pushq %rbx
The source code is:
---
/* Make sure that external refences for libcalls are generated even for
indirect calls. */
/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -mcmodel=large" } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "globl\t__divti3" } } */
__int128 a, b; void foo () { a = a / b; }
---
Looking at, for example, gcc.target/i386/falign-functions-3.c it seems that test avoids scanning for global references on darwin. Probably the new test needs the same exception.
FX
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: [r14-5930 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -Os (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64
2023-12-01 13:55 FX Coudert
@ 2023-12-01 14:38 ` Iain Sandoe
2023-12-02 9:04 ` FX Coudert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Iain Sandoe @ 2023-12-01 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: FX Coudert; +Cc: GCC Patches, Jakub Jelinek, jose.marchesi
Hi FX,
> On 1 Dec 2023, at 13:55, FX Coudert <fxcoudert@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That commit makes gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c on darwin:
>
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/libcall-1.c scan-assembler globl\t__divti3
>
> because the pattern is not found, the only mention of divti3 in the generated assembly is:
>
> LCFI0:
> movabsq $_b@GOTOFF, %rdx
> movabsq $___divti3@PLTOFF, %rax
> leaq L2(%rip), %r15
> pushq %rbx
>
>
> The source code is:
>
> ---
> /* Make sure that external refences for libcalls are generated even for
> indirect calls. */
>
> /* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
> /* { dg-options "-O2 -mcmodel=large" } */
mcmodel=large s not supported (yet) on any Darwin arch [PR90698], so the test needs skipping or xfailing, I think (either way with a reference to the PR).
Iain
> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "globl\t__divti3" } } */
>
> __int128 a, b; void foo () { a = a / b; }
> ---
>
> Looking at, for example, gcc.target/i386/falign-functions-3.c it seems that test avoids scanning for global references on darwin. Probably the new test needs the same exception.
>
> FX
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-11 8:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-11-28 23:19 [r14-5930 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/libcall-2.c -Os (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64 haochen.jiang
2023-11-29 6:51 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-11-29 7:51 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-11-29 8:20 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-11-29 8:22 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-11-29 8:32 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-12-01 13:55 FX Coudert
2023-12-01 14:38 ` Iain Sandoe
2023-12-02 9:04 ` FX Coudert
2023-12-04 8:40 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-12-11 8:23 ` FX Coudert
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).