From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 68433 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2016 20:35:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 68422 invoked by uid 89); 6 Feb 2016 20:35:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=1756, 54C7, 44D5, 54c7 X-HELO: mail-out.m-online.net Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (HELO mail-out.m-online.net) (212.18.0.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 20:35:47 +0000 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3pyQNw1vfXz3hjby; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 21:35:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3pyQNv1G3jzvhVH; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 21:35:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oDzSs2VTNB08; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 21:35:42 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: P70VcobzYLf11KUbsUCIxBFYmNdPJ0p7WZ9ltUbq5S+L8rOs6yRAdZkHF7nO+HjN Received: from igel.home (host-188-174-223-14.customer.m-online.net [188.174.223.14]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 21:35:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9EC632C4F27; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 21:35:41 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Bill Schmidt Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, dje.gcc@gmail.com, anton@samba.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix PR63354 References: <1453394918.22933.3.camel@gnopaine> X-Yow: I pretend I'm living in a styrofoam packing crate, high in th' SWISS ALPS, still unable to accept th' idea of TOUCH-TONE DIALING!! Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 20:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1453394918.22933.3.camel@gnopaine> (Bill Schmidt's message of "Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:48:38 -0600") Message-ID: <87twll4lwi.fsf@linux-m68k.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00474.txt.bz2 Bill Schmidt writes: > Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr63354.c > =================================================================== > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr63354.c (revision 0) > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr63354.c (working copy) > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ > +/* Verify that we don't stack a frame for leaf functions when using > + -pg -mprofile-kernel. */ > + > +/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc64*-*-* } } } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -pg -mprofile-kernel" } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "mtlr" } } */ > + > +int foo(void) > +{ > + return 1; > +} With -m32: FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr63354.c (test for excess errors) Excess errors: /daten/gcc/gcc-20160205/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr63354.c:1:0: error: -mprofile-kernel not supported in this configuration Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."