public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
To: Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] picolibc: Add picolibc linking help
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 10:38:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v8qg8bqx.fsf@keithp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+yXCZCzx=M_Ei8-BDA1Z4nnHLkqKzPMpntVLVy=xwRmHtqnhQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 829 bytes --]

Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com> writes:

> I am thinking that maybe we should add
> -mlibc=[newlib|newlib-nano|picolibc|unknown] option to bare-matel
> toolchain, one reason is having an unify interface to select libc
> implementation between clang/LLVM, spec file is a GCC specific stuff,
> that cause very bad compatibility between GCC and clang/LLVM, and
> having option to control that would be better since clang/LLVM don't
> have those configure time option.

You can create specs file for each library so that you select the
library with --specs=picolibc.specs or --specs=newlib-nano.specs. That
seems sufficient as you can mess with various compiler options and set
the header paths. Crosstool-ng does this and it enables delivering
newlib, newlib-nano and picolibc in the same toolchain.

-- 
-keith

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-25 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-24 18:04 Keith Packard
2022-08-24 18:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] picolibc: Allow default libc to be specified to configure Keith Packard
2022-08-24 18:04   ` [PATCH 2/3] picolibc: Add newlib and picolibc as default C library choices Keith Packard
2022-08-24 18:04     ` [PATCH 3/3] picolibc: Add '--oslib=' option when default C library is picolibc Keith Packard
2022-08-24 18:24 ` [PATCH 0/3] picolibc: Add picolibc linking help Andrew Pinski
2022-08-24 19:32   ` Keith Packard
2022-08-25  7:16     ` Kito Cheng
2022-08-25 17:38       ` Keith Packard [this message]
2022-09-02 12:36 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-09-03  6:02   ` Keith Packard
2022-09-03  6:07 ` Keith Packard
2022-09-03  6:07   ` [PATCH 1/3] Allow default libc to be specified to configure Keith Packard
2022-09-03  6:07   ` [PATCH 2/3] Add newlib and picolibc as default C library choices Keith Packard
2022-09-03  6:07   ` [PATCH 3/3] Add '--oslib=' option when default C library is picolibc Keith Packard
2022-11-21  7:11     ` Sebastian Huber
2023-02-05  7:10   ` [PATCH 0/3] picolibc: Add picolibc linking help (v3) Keith Packard
2023-02-05  7:10     ` [PATCH 1/3] Allow default libc to be specified to configure Keith Packard
2023-02-05  7:10     ` [PATCH 2/3] Add newlib and picolibc as default C library choices Keith Packard
2023-02-05  7:10     ` [PATCH 3/3] Add '--oslib=' option when default C library is picolibc Keith Packard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v8qg8bqx.fsf@keithp.com \
    --to=keithp@keithp.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).