public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>
To: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org>
Cc: Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com>,
	 GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>,
	 Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
	 Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@arm.com>,
	 Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Account for prologue spills in reg_pressure scheduling
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wq7u30g6.fsf@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <183D9AE9-ADFE-4E20-A8FF-B323A631FCC4@linaro.org> (Maxim	Kuvyrkov's message of "Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:56:34 +1300")

Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org> writes:
> [Adding ARM maintainers to CC]
>
> On Oct 21, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Maxim,
>> 
>> Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>>> Thanks, benchmarking results are welcome!  AArch64 doesn't use reg_pressure
>>> scheduling by default.  Use "-fsched-pressure
>>> --param=sched-pressure-algorithm=2" to enable same thing as on ARM.  I would
>>> imagine C++ and Fortran floating-point code to be most affected.
>> 
>> On aarch64 I only see perf improvements with your patch: no perf
>> degradations on
>> all the tests that I have run.
>> 
>> base0: r216447, -O3
>> base1: r216447, -O3 -fsched-pressure --param=sched-pressure-algorithm=2
>> patch: r216447 + your patch, -O3 -fsched-pressure
>> --param=sched-pressure-algorithm=2
>> 
>> patch vs. base1 is only an improvement.
>> 
>> base1 vs. base0 has a few good improvements, and some small degradations: your
>> patch improves the perf for one of the degradations to the point it is better
>> now with -fsched-pressure --param=sched-pressure-algorithm=2 than at -O3.
>> 
>> Could we turn on "-fsched-pressure --param=sched-pressure-algorithm=2" by
>> default for aarch64?
>
> These are great results, yay!

+1.  Thanks for running these tests.  If you have time, it'd also be
interesting to try the same thing with --param=sched-pressure-algorithm=1
(which should be equivalent to not having the --param, but better safe
than sorry).  Is algorithm 1 or algorithm 2 better for aarch64?

Thanks,
Richard

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-20 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-20  7:03 Maxim Kuvyrkov
2014-10-20 19:13 ` Sebastian Pop
2014-10-20 19:23   ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2014-10-20 20:44     ` Sebastian Pop
2014-10-20 20:59       ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2014-10-20 21:21         ` Sebastian Pop
2014-10-20 21:21         ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2014-10-20 21:57           ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2014-10-20 22:27             ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2014-10-21  0:01             ` Sebastian Pop
2014-10-20 22:13         ` Evandro Menezes
2014-10-21 15:27 ` Vladimir Makarov
2014-10-22  7:45   ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2014-10-22 12:51     ` Richard Sandiford
2014-10-22 14:47     ` Vladimir Makarov
2014-10-23  3:19       ` Maxim Kuvyrkov
2014-10-23  7:25         ` Richard Sandiford
2014-10-23  7:28           ` Maxim Kuvyrkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wq7u30g6.fsf@googlemail.com \
    --to=rdsandiford@googlemail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=marcus.shawcroft@arm.com \
    --cc=maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com \
    --cc=rearnsha@arm.com \
    --cc=sebpop@gmail.com \
    --cc=vmakarov@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).