From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 599A3385B52D for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:58:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 599A3385B52D Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 599A3385B52D Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1700737085; cv=none; b=QI8S7ZdYRej6hH5nZtb7MznRn8o/PvXIYsN4kMjXKgmcPAV/uSUu0wa5fvzgpWPs8Htu00atGjw+F3lWWKRyLWj2pAeg3L80m+tHgiQmI0Dzonuzbyq4qhj/3+ENM2+ldn5T+cnjenQbduPQRPPYi9YCWPd3bEmRDJPbSIVigKs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1700737085; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3Jtq0YV29pbpADOqhauKueBh1BhMaKV4CWtq/FtBur4=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=Ur3u0LJxrZPl8MqFdaufq2d2ZPn8x48DllNq++5l5i7DjoeO2VAULADSajexZp4hZr3GyYoC3I7zlwpOLyTtunD93Q8Fdxv9NxmjSRX83Nguh2Osoe2is+5M/vztAqpM3rEbSVJu8FHMBiDfmrFZzPCtNjvbjf+3raxbtfi6VZE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1700737084; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3Jtq0YV29pbpADOqhauKueBh1BhMaKV4CWtq/FtBur4=; b=hfLu8wwGAt0vpTz6YX4LS29S8V7kgY9aPzy9lY0G3A6mgnV/Vtsmi43V7zndt7Fqt7gMsI J+gojwwbAXcPlqu2JlRsWdOqjqZ4ou/Lp44sUiyyaT6Rn1T5kWs6mbaE8x/OX6ZITVWb8f GZLEdgkJBI6lMMfmOt/6a1mLyqAgtbo= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-617-2acLH_8pMhWPeaVEkfoitQ-1; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 05:58:02 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 2acLH_8pMhWPeaVEkfoitQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 565A5280A9B6; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg.str.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.108]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B2912026D4C; Thu, 23 Nov 2023 10:58:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: Tatsuyuki Ishi Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rui314@gmail.com, ruiu@bluewhale.systems, kito.cheng@gmail.com, jeffreyalaw@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] RISC-V: Implement TLS Descriptors. References: <20230817181308.122802-2-ishitatsuyuki@gmail.com> <20231120131726.52280-1-ishitatsuyuki@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:57:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20231120131726.52280-1-ishitatsuyuki@gmail.com> (Tatsuyuki Ishi's message of "Mon, 20 Nov 2023 22:17:26 +0900") Message-ID: <87y1eod9e1.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.4 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: * Tatsuyuki Ishi: > I've considered gating this behind a GAS feature test, but it seems > nontrivial especially for restricting the variants available at runtime. > Since TLS descriptors is not selected by default, I've decided to leave it > ungated. > > In other news, I have made some progress on binutils side, and I'll try to > update the GAS / ld patch set with relaxation included, by the end of this > month. Is there a glibc patch with the run-time implementation already? I'm curious how you are going to implement saving the vector register file Thanks, Florian