From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10406 invoked by alias); 17 Nov 2002 08:34:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10385 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2002 08:34:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.enyo.de) (212.9.189.162) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 17 Nov 2002 08:34:10 -0000 Received: from [212.9.189.171] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #2) id 18DKsJ-00055J-00; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 09:33:51 +0100 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.34 #4) id 18DKsH-0000EH-00; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 09:33:49 +0100 To: Geert Bosch Cc: Robert Dewar , "Joseph S. Myers" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: ada/8560, [3.2], mainline: GNAT 3.14p is now required References: From: Florian Weimer Mail-Followup-To: Geert Bosch , Robert Dewar , "Joseph S. Myers" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 00:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Geert Bosch's message of "Sat, 16 Nov 2002 21:28:06 -0500 (EST)") Message-ID: <87y97sbno2.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00988.txt.bz2 Geert Bosch writes: > On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Florian Weimer wrote: > As far as I can tell, no such binaries have been released. I believe > that in the current state of the FSF GNAT sources, ACT doesn't want to > be too closely associated with them. *sigh* > > This is not true. I can fully understand if you do not want to release binaries at this stage, although I regret it. (The maintainership issue is completely unrelated.)