From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3473 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2004 17:59:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3466 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2004 17:59:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.5) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2004 17:59:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 13999 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2004 17:59:00 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO taltos.codesourcery.com) (zack@127.0.0.1) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2004 17:59:00 -0000 Received: by taltos.codesourcery.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 17 Jul 2004 10:56:45 -0700 To: Eric Botcazou Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Unreviewed patches References: <200407152302.05079.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> From: Zack Weinberg Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 02:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200407152302.05079.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> (Eric Botcazou's message of "Thu, 15 Jul 2004 23:02:05 +0200") Message-ID: <87zn5y7c0y.fsf@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg01749.txt.bz2 Eric Botcazou writes: > EH-compatible -ffunction-sections: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-04/msg01768.html I think it would be cleaner to handle this with ELF section groups. H.J. Lu has, I believe, completed binutils support. Also I'd like to see testing with C++ as well as Ada. > Fix PR rtl-optimization/16028 (reload inheritance) > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg01647.html I'm not qualified to review reload patches, sorry. > Prettify assembly output on SPARC (part #2) > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00925.html This *would* be an OK except for the concerns you raise with regard to final_scan_insn, hppa, and sh, which confuse the issue. I cannot tell if there is a problem. If there is, please send a patch to fix it, and then respin this patch. If there is not, or if there is but your patch can be proven not to make it worse, please explain. > Fix PR rtl-optimization/16294 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg01167.html already approved elsewhere. zw