From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5885 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2003 19:46:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5876 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2003 19:46:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.73.237.138) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Oct 2003 19:46:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 12445 invoked from network); 19 Oct 2003 19:45:57 -0000 Received: from taltos.codesourcery.com (zack@66.92.218.83) by mail.codesourcery.com with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Oct 2003 19:45:57 -0000 Received: by taltos.codesourcery.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 19 Oct 2003 12:46:09 -0700 From: "Zack Weinberg" To: Andreas Jaeger Cc: Jan Hubicka , Zdenek Dvorak , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch ping References: <20031019101617.GA15107@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <874qy5ruw7.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> <20031019183138.GX15904@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 19:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Jaeger's message of "Sun, 19 Oct 2003 20:38:14 +0200") Message-ID: <87znfxqada.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg01650.txt.bz2 Andreas Jaeger writes: >> The actual interface to profiling code came in earlier with separate >> patch. This patch has no consequences to the profiling, just uses the >> interface we agreed on earlier, so I would say that there is no problem >> from profiler side. (this is also why I don't feel this belong to area I >> can approve as gcov maintainer) > > Zack, since the profiler code is ok, I interpret your message that > this is approved. Correct? Mm.. yeah, I guess so. zw