From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 102583 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2017 18:08:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 102563 invoked by uid 89); 3 Apr 2017 18:08:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:5ddc3aa, H*i:sk:5ddc3aa X-HELO: mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (HELO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com) (148.163.156.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Apr 2017 18:08:44 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v33I4Axp114363 for ; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 14:08:44 -0400 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com (e31.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.149]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 29kqbk5yxa-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 03 Apr 2017 14:08:44 -0400 Received: from localhost by e31.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 12:08:43 -0600 Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.130.18) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (192.168.1.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 12:08:39 -0600 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.235]) by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id v33I8dvV10879446; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 11:08:39 -0700 Received: from b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5580E78057; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 12:08:39 -0600 (MDT) Received: from otta.rchland.ibm.com (unknown [9.10.86.70]) by b03ledav004.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F80078038; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 12:08:38 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix PR target/80246, DFP builtins using the wrong types To: Segher Boessenkool References: <20170329222858.GZ4402@gate.crashing.org> <530c97bd-1669-dd67-528e-3f879efa8bac@vnet.ibm.com> <87o9wfz2rc.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <20170402185354.GJ4402@gate.crashing.org> <5ddc3aa0-f8ad-3ca4-4d70-1759f0bd9bb1@vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Andreas Schwab , GCC Patches , David Edelsohn , Bill Schmidt From: Peter Bergner Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 18:08:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5ddc3aa0-f8ad-3ca4-4d70-1759f0bd9bb1@vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17040318-8235-0000-0000-00000B3EAC3A X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00006876; HX=3.00000240; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000208; SDB=6.00842580; UDB=6.00415060; IPR=6.00620755; BA=6.00005262; NDR=6.00000001; ZLA=6.00000005; ZF=6.00000009; ZB=6.00000000; ZP=6.00000000; ZH=6.00000000; ZU=6.00000002; MB=3.00014889; XFM=3.00000013; UTC=2017-04-03 18:08:41 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17040318-8236-0000-0000-00003AD6CE9F Message-Id: <8967f148-5bd0-20ea-f787-94146c07a50a@vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-04-03_16:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1702020001 definitions=main-1704030161 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg00103.txt.bz2 On 4/3/17 12:01 PM, Peter Bergner wrote: > On 4/3/17 11:04 AM, Peter Bergner wrote: >> On 4/2/17 1:53 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>> I also have a fix for the dfp-builtin-1.c problem. >> >> Something like the following maybe? It seems to work for me. >> I think the hard_dfp predicate was added after the dfp-builtin-[12].c >> test cases were added, which is maybe why Mike used powerpc_vsx_ok? >> Seems like we should switch it to using hard_dfp now. > > As we discussed offline, I'll commit the following patch to fix up > the dfp-builtin-1.c failures. I'll also commit this to the GCC 5 & 6 > release branches, since the same issue exists there. Ok, committed everywhere. Thanks and sorry about the breakage! :-( Peter