From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5043 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2011 21:48:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 5035 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2011 21:48:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_FRT_LOLITA1 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from newsmtp5.atmel.com (HELO sjogate2.atmel.com) (204.2.163.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 21:48:06 +0000 Received: from csomb01.corp.atmel.com ([10.95.30.150]) by sjogate2.atmel.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p6RLiktp015829; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [Patch,AVR]: PR49687 (better widening 32-bit mul) Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 01:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <8D64F155F1C88743BFDC71288E8E2DA8033CDAA5@csomb01.corp.atmel.com> In-Reply-To: <4E307C4D.4050409@gjlay.de> References: <4E2D3821.3090007@gjlay.de> <8D64F155F1C88743BFDC71288E8E2DA8032C1E5F@csomb01.corp.atmel.com> <4E2D99CF.3050004@gjlay.de> <8D64F155F1C88743BFDC71288E8E2DA8032C2159@csomb01.corp.atmel.com> <4E3010E6.8020402@gjlay.de> <4E302A72.1010002@redhat.com> <4E30354D.3090700@gjlay.de> <4E30406C.6050307@redhat.com> <4E307C4D.4050409@gjlay.de> From: "Weddington, Eric" To: "Georg-Johann Lay" , "Richard Henderson" Cc: , "Anatoly Sokolov" , "Denis Chertykov" Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg02474.txt.bz2 > -----Original Message----- > From: Georg-Johann Lay [mailto:avr@gjlay.de] > Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:00 PM > To: Richard Henderson > Cc: Weddington, Eric; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Anatoly Sokolov; Denis > Chertykov > Subject: Re: [Patch,AVR]: PR49687 (better widening 32-bit mul) >=20 > > > > Fair enough. > > > > I didn't review the asm code, but the rest of the patch look ok to me. > > > > r~ >=20 > Thanks, Eric will review the asm part :-) LOL I trust you on the asm stuff. Ok by me. However, how is our test coverage in this area? Eric