From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CE1C3858D1E;
	Mon, 14 Nov 2022 22:26:43 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3CE1C3858D1E
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com
Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E8333E60;
	Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:26:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.1.80] (213-240-98-62.adsl.highway.telekom.at [213.240.98.62])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD67C33E72;
	Mon, 14 Nov 2022 17:26:38 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 23:26:36 +0100 (CET)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
cc: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Martin_Li=A8ka?= <mliska@suse.cz>, 
    Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>, GCC Mailing List <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, 
    GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Revert Sphinx documentation [Was: Issues with Sphinx]
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdSYVhsiJxxLgCrA4LsRR5XMUvS8KzO1f=S8ravjftyUjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8a9278b6-b7a9-eed6-5f37-1e53ed4af84c@pfeifer.com>
References: <CA+=Sn1m=F6JVszrTFS_v=rfC7nrO=X5pSbgestxtPr___QGQuA@mail.gmail.com> <e534170c-dab4-6498-ac54-f767414598a5@suse.cz> <029e0760-3f48-4b7a-a3f8-99a2c32536b0@suse.cz> <CAH6eHdSYVhsiJxxLgCrA4LsRR5XMUvS8KzO1f=S8ravjftyUjQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.10 on 209.68.5.143
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>

On Mon, 14 Nov 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I formatted my new region/endregion pragmas on one line because that
> seemed to be how it should be done for rSt, e.g. we had:
> 
> ``#pragma GCC push_options`` ``#pragma GCC pop_options``
> 
> But I think the attached patch is more correct for how we document
> pragmas in texinfo.
> 
> OK for trunk?

Looks good to my eyes. Thank you for caring for such details, Jonathan!

Gerald