From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
To: FX Coudert <fxcoudert@gmail.com>, fortran@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: add IEEE_QUIET_* and IEEE_SIGNALING_* comparisons
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 14:26:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d3773e6-58a4-ec38-cfd1-f4fb7666e7e3@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C1565A65-4FA2-4C16-8AF9-E8A2776D5067@gmail.com>
Hi FX,
Am 06.06.23 um 21:29 schrieb FX Coudert via Gcc-patches:
> Hi,
>
> This is a repost of the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/600887.html
> which never really got green light, but I stopped pushing because stage 1 was closing and I was out of time.
I just looked at that thread. I guess if you answer Mikael's
questions at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601744.html
the patch will be fine.
> It depends on a middle-end patch adding a type-generic __builtin_iseqsig(), which I posted for review at: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/620801.html
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK to commit (once the middle-end patch is accepted)?
>
> FX
>
Thanks,
Harald
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: fortran@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: add IEEE_QUIET_* and IEEE_SIGNALING_* comparisons
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 14:26:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d3773e6-58a4-ec38-cfd1-f4fb7666e7e3@gmx.de> (raw)
Message-ID: <20230608122642.xXennAi2ygGXE6b8dqRwGdikC_ZA_sMAN9WECGDWHXE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C1565A65-4FA2-4C16-8AF9-E8A2776D5067@gmail.com>
Hi FX,
Am 06.06.23 um 21:29 schrieb FX Coudert via Gcc-patches:
> Hi,
>
> This is a repost of the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/600887.html
> which never really got green light, but I stopped pushing because stage 1 was closing and I was out of time.
I just looked at that thread. I guess if you answer Mikael's
questions at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601744.html
the patch will be fine.
> It depends on a middle-end patch adding a type-generic __builtin_iseqsig(), which I posted for review at: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/620801.html
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK to commit (once the middle-end patch is accepted)?
>
> FX
>
Thanks,
Harald
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-08 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-06 19:29 FX Coudert
2023-06-08 12:26 ` Harald Anlauf [this message]
2023-06-08 12:26 ` Harald Anlauf
2023-06-10 15:21 ` FX Coudert
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-09-02 11:37 FX
2022-09-02 15:37 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-09-02 15:54 ` FX
2022-09-02 16:03 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-09-02 16:17 ` FX
2022-09-17 11:58 ` Mikael Morin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d3773e6-58a4-ec38-cfd1-f4fb7666e7e3@gmx.de \
--to=anlauf@gmx.de \
--cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=fxcoudert@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).