From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F4533858C62; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 12:26:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 4F4533858C62 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmx.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmx.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1686227203; x=1686832003; i=anlauf@gmx.de; bh=qNFhkVvQA4/tgckach3OWrfPmLMK99NM/G1MjAbCMJc=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=f43VX/iRojUeJsKto4YCM5O8U4OmPLaJLuOEe0LJcnDjrU8QpL73N7QrjfFetmSYfNospTa dAWfiuXeIeuwW3+XxYedA0qrTD/g2MDPvRQ9SxLNfsmnNu7NVVqcvrDzW5gRDtHRa5EX10vZt kLFx6rtxjG8AT7CXHBBEZTNdEXhVzN2DVcYCx8oKSW/Z4DU3/Fiu2pHZLC5OeGox8+WTNviJh d3O6Sd2QrevbN6JWB9NIcRU8+zpObkxr2I9IYf8aMq6C6GZFuKQPbEahFUoMrLEa4xf6q80+f rjvgJbZdhNFAvV3or6y5rSavH1qsc2q9KqKgpGy4MuJba0CRVIvA== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from [192.168.178.29] ([79.251.11.33]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mj8qd-1pd9Ak2F9x-00fD1N; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 14:26:43 +0200 Message-ID: <8d3773e6-58a4-ec38-cfd1-f4fb7666e7e3@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 14:26:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: add IEEE_QUIET_* and IEEE_SIGNALING_* comparisons To: FX Coudert , fortran@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Newsgroups: gmane.comp.gcc.patches,gmane.comp.gcc.fortran References: Content-Language: en-US From: Harald Anlauf In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:YaBGZR/DxhB9LuTuSlaNMH5A0SDPEBQEiTBiIFYLr6YcY4h4Eoi 1YUXNGGRznLpVSTtgBMZ38wQ/6sMTA/QkkU2i25y0Ts1a77SvfL14eLttze9k+6M96NTOpn axiEbrLr1EdKbL3g+CEJH/Es4OfYbgmjA+ZTaMFW70QVsJasPQy11XtvtuDY8lhco0rGdKb E9tS7HlK/K1iVhenZNizg== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:aU6bJCpodsU=;NWqQtf+az4T2B6Nxu9k9zJQKnxI ZNkZhO29fTBaOfohcLLA5SyfvHYuIwuNQBZcU1yKmsnpNcdF51pnNF8HBBDjME8ORa4bAnNDT ZJOqLKdwjUlgPv2Ux+eYB0M93oekBDP1Vlwv6jqA9NrFrupMtEoQSbEBgdn6+53XZKpEEAJ4R WZWO/jKu73hSa+i5cffb7GjnF0LkHNC/GtWchoOubtjaUplrpn8lGDjViCFU6Jv0HiJcsLJC6 /nZWCdXQGwTAmf8i7Y4FqF23NC1+CNjQ6nb8mz+p/1UHuPVHtrN2oRW6RBRzz7Vg5fcAkRgeq CynR5l3+dwknM5setPjjTd9txFiwFLPlxpgEkLCewzuv8PxnD2pAS35ch4wEo+m7SrC3Euag2 jVkIklushD8/9bHuKXzu5YVVMyURPcLFcVYU6dF6m/3Jz7/VxUAv0c9l2pX3xaX5T9+7xfbMo 1yVeB9QBMY+kS/t5gYkTV1/sBM24BPDvbOMw33Ly43x1QG4PqQnvGsNTYqIrnKVf/4DkuEsqj sJ4IJr11tAutbQWjYGX6d/hlyS446IqCWdnakNGEPg23gZz1Lk0Yy+bJrAcVlPBJIif/gstvo /ILoa6PEcMTZLhofDeJjVhGduy05jw1gBfw++Xls7ikJahkoAaZcNjD8rP86FddqI6kGsmk55 Zdp0ul7wsmfXZ/1TuYqdBX30/xMCyp5f7/+67uf0nqovscSmUGl/iHk+5wK2IhgBVIGtDY7Lh s9JOK0OehmwMnk89T1iIikEX8y7M9zJSDpUgts26Ub4rXBy+L2GufopX+T8cVLWf1Q25Flgcv OB22lWcOUqA7dRwh+aOS7F75CSMBz7g+x+iD6/pxc/7XDvTYoTS8zQJVtGtOI8DAHlZKWUWfZ tMd3Zh/Qp5AfivYE7R0kidNN5s7MZlFs5sPTaETCZ8mOw6FV363NDlreefjPL5Xwl1hO/mVuS dmp+CwSbr4h3+iMSq6+O3tZMsxg= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi FX, Am 06.06.23 um 21:29 schrieb FX Coudert via Gcc-patches: > Hi, > > This is a repost of the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patch= es/2022-September/600887.html > which never really got green light, but I stopped pushing because stage = 1 was closing and I was out of time. I just looked at that thread. I guess if you answer Mikael's questions at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601744.html the patch will be fine. > It depends on a middle-end patch adding a type-generic __builtin_iseqsig= (), which I posted for review at: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patche= s/2023-June/620801.html > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK to commit (once th= e middle-end patch is accepted)? > > FX > Thanks, Harald From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ciao.gmane.io (ciao.gmane.io [116.202.254.214]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D8CE3858C62 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 12:26:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 8D8CE3858C62 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmx.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=m.gmane-mx.org Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q7Ej5-0000z6-A3 for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2023 14:26:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Harald Anlauf Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fortran: add IEEE_QUIET_* and IEEE_SIGNALING_* comparisons Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 14:26:42 +0200 Message-ID: <8d3773e6-58a4-ec38-cfd1-f4fb7666e7e3@gmx.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Cc: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Message-ID: <20230608122642.xXennAi2ygGXE6b8dqRwGdikC_ZA_sMAN9WECGDWHXE@z> Hi FX, Am 06.06.23 um 21:29 schrieb FX Coudert via Gcc-patches: > Hi, > > This is a repost of the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/600887.html > which never really got green light, but I stopped pushing because stage 1 was closing and I was out of time. I just looked at that thread. I guess if you answer Mikael's questions at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601744.html the patch will be fine. > It depends on a middle-end patch adding a type-generic __builtin_iseqsig(), which I posted for review at: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/620801.html > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK to commit (once the middle-end patch is accepted)? > > FX > Thanks, Harald