From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 301A53858CDB for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:00:02 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 301A53858CDB Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1679583601; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=OkkQjyp06JrX746MNoISk5PLcWuidhrxRFcdoebUJFU=; b=a9VicXjopvHS2qQSTKIJKwQBcbH6xrFPAo6rCnsxFsmUbxPmDICyxSCDptX0DDXBxEh4ED 2cZmXAWkPXXEQKZ21rlmbyn4QsLZFP7nUK2EAxiWBBZQrBpuWT5TOlZ7RUPgtF9EB8gU5x pU4HWr6vJfckyB/yoVNJeKLecfvB4uk= Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-340-wcPOJ8JmPRGRRVYSSY_ghQ-1; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:00:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: wcPOJ8JmPRGRRVYSSY_ghQ-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id bn9-20020a056000060900b002cfe8493fe6so2573779wrb.4 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 07:59:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679583599; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OkkQjyp06JrX746MNoISk5PLcWuidhrxRFcdoebUJFU=; b=zHtWir2YqsFpzS9+6sCCknJQeh6+ojKQJXe0/j4RiYKciW6Xgkf+PLbwBCClUgvmM5 8BgV71gm+GZCR++SsuyW6f5W8o/8iZcT3XYiBuLbteXVgk9WP1I6hpkhlCF29kiZlGhv TNXz9UofZSsBse/n+A2uFCzaRLbpSHjl6OVYFsSYEN6ch6OE6YF/IFlFHROAIMavIxhU v9UlssaWbj6rPydTxiWofIuhYDGuqw6cHpMpQxQ8sdN9TiwexxA90N9uIc1QcWHwNqxB EMP4oAnU16t5Kb81LvwJ/KCp8ZJFTsG4bxuLii/rTvNmOf4vrN6VNqhkESqE+GsVYYMZ cJow== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9e1CEZFaG3g59ndv3Uue8PJ5dT2G9YKPf3NmpEGRXQMy8xy8faN GjMrXVgKMpZPp2i5qFWJl3v0TYMeV6hoZ+dXH0tPYWj4AQq+9qCn3OUdbBUTmpYOJK71CbN/vjz sHys9xFNfNNY1uA8cWg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6742:0:b0:2ce:3e8d:1e3 with SMTP id l2-20020a5d6742000000b002ce3e8d01e3mr2886515wrw.46.1679583598918; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 07:59:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bI+58fRM6EJ5GDMVhae7QVfh/+5tHTUCR+sdIHabXQy2hYjBNizDBfaqZk7UAA/HPWtd7QrA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6742:0:b0:2ce:3e8d:1e3 with SMTP id l2-20020a5d6742000000b002ce3e8d01e3mr2886504wrw.46.1679583598627; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 07:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.201] ([139.47.42.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o17-20020a056000011100b002d30fe0d2fcsm16322188wrx.13.2023.03.23.07.59.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Mar 2023 07:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8e031ba0-8842-05b1-f67c-7cebbc14ef39@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:59:57 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ranger: Ranger meets aspell To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Andrew MacLeod , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <1782a2dc-bb85-f4e4-a88c-2b675a1f83bc@redhat.com> From: Aldy Hernandez In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 3/23/23 15:20, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 03:05:45PM +0100, Aldy Hernandez wrote: >> >> >> On 3/23/23 14:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> I've noticed a comment typo in tree-vrp.cc and decided to quickly >>> skim aspell -c on the ranger sources (with quick I on everything that >>> looked ok or roughly ok). >>> But not being a native English speaker, I could get stuff wrong. >>> The most questionable seems 3 occurrences of involutary/involutory, >>> I've used involuntary, but am not sure if that's what you meant. >> >> An involutary function is a function who is its own inverse, so AFAIK >> "involutary" is correct. That being said, it's not a common word, and I > > Isn't that involutory? > https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/involutory Ooops, yeah. > Though, seems searching for it reveals both spellings and it isn't clear > what is the difference. I'll keep them as is then. Whatever works. Obviously I don't know how to spell it either :). Aldy