From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Received: from cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de
 [IPv6:2001:4dd0:100:1062:25:2:0:3])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC6313858406;
 Thu, 18 Nov 2021 10:51:50 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org BC6313858406
Received: from cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de [89.1.8.201])
 by cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A29C124E0;
 Thu, 18 Nov 2021 11:51:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:4dd7:10ca:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d]
 (2001-4dd7-10ca-0-7285-c2ff-fe6c-992d.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de
 [IPv6:2001:4dd7:10ca:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by cc-smtpin1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 18A3611DF3;
 Thu, 18 Nov 2021 11:51:45 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/101329 - ICE: Invalid expression in
 gfc_element_size
To: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>, fortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
 gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <trinity-f916ff9f-5b36-483e-8afc-c91e8ce0c441-1637184480215@3c-app-gmx-bap70>
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Message-ID: <8e37ed27-f0b8-5e27-f567-b54717394b3c@netcologne.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 11:51:45 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <trinity-f916ff9f-5b36-483e-8afc-c91e8ce0c441-1637184480215@3c-app-gmx-bap70>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-NetCologne-Spam: L
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 18A3611DF3
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 10:51:52 -0000

On 17.11.21 22:28, Harald Anlauf via Fortran wrote:
> Dear Fortranners,
> 
> as NULL() is not interoperable, we have to reject it.
> Confirmed by NAG.  Other compilers show "interesting behavior".
> 
> Obvious patch by Steve.  Regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
> 
> OK for mainline?

OK, and thanks!

Best regards

	Thomas