From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2F683858D39 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2023 13:29:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org C2F683858D39 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1675862978; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xjIPRlWTe0ca8o6UgUT55vuq8D9sd4zOIX3jpaRS5iw=; b=IvwMhyLqw0NRQ79yBoIuNCtPoYquAXRI33JvPiIcyqryP52V2jYWm7U+HAAwnBO6bNOyMA wN1fuQFx8XOJx/K3d7xmDQ/055lTo8G1LbKzewXS6iJi7NeJRPBHYOA86G/vJbXYxClac3 7+FH6FjHoOWzMGnXpo2O7rHBDOZ6+R4= Received: from mail-io1-f72.google.com (mail-io1-f72.google.com [209.85.166.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-450-HORQpIV0OvqcGaVlNDq-xQ-1; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 08:29:37 -0500 X-MC-Unique: HORQpIV0OvqcGaVlNDq-xQ-1 Received: by mail-io1-f72.google.com with SMTP id i8-20020a6b7908000000b007132e024fb5so11061216iop.0 for ; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 05:29:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xjIPRlWTe0ca8o6UgUT55vuq8D9sd4zOIX3jpaRS5iw=; b=6s9GBlUT+U3uJ8qYXVVkJ/7G5PEyvRxPcEBHiZAVJqiADdDaFPHqQNqbtTd8FHu1O5 8mWKFyB4vSPzyy8Wlbydwo02VViKi4CWQPq4VOoRIz/cn+ev/pHviM7CP8JuV4Plv5G5 H7Dqv9F3/SqmVjHBng9StGBjIaLdOR4FOcNERrDTzZK+dXAiAL4tyx9f82ec0HKMVJwz y0aCI//OMqT4PUcib5TbWq7BE1qME7YzYF/Q3YAkHGyk8AhfSNqN06REeJAAIQ/WwowS PCa3VrNQkD0pJvKtj5wB9vtdzWOOtSLp+O8o0/Mtd28g4P9sXXG+SU6nuoeSuIB2C7+X 1Czw== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKU4iLrcSCSVYpNSbUS4QvdaZZ4aed7GTfQjkAI1s4cOfjzJIV5C 3xpAbwHLJfYCrzfGbNuijSl+gqOxJI0oZhDXTI/sMgaCl4HZL3gFTGpTY99j4+ZMAlDgTC+L9o5 pcnIWBO6LfucJb78q8w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:17cf:b0:310:eb06:cccf with SMTP id z15-20020a056e0217cf00b00310eb06cccfmr8107575ilu.8.1675862976592; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 05:29:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8gxfrQZ28eQYC33xjx19aF/hIwNXaTx/0ySp6kMT7/NtKtSar6XvHuulq6VQGl2K+/aKslJA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:17cf:b0:310:eb06:cccf with SMTP id z15-20020a056e0217cf00b00310eb06cccfmr8107565ilu.8.1675862976258; Wed, 08 Feb 2023 05:29:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (23-233-12-120.cpe.pppoe.ca. [23.233.12.120]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n44-20020a02712c000000b003a96f9940ddsm5456322jac.102.2023.02.08.05.29.35 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Feb 2023 05:29:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8ea180c3-3590-cd4b-a282-c99c83de94e8@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 08:29:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [pushed] [PR103541] RA: Implement reuse of equivalent memory for caller saves optimization To: Andrew Pinski Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" References: <7ee31afa-d5c5-3d34-85e6-6034165876de@redhat.com> From: Vladimir Makarov In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 2/7/23 22:48, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 6:08 AM Vladimir Makarov via Gcc-patches > wrote: >> The following patch solves >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103541 >> >> The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86-64, aarch64, >> and ppc64le. > What languages did you test? Because I think I am getting a bootstrap > failure while building libgo in 32bit x86 due to this patch. I used c and c++ only.  Sorry for all the troubles with the patch. I've just reverted the patch and I will try to resolve the issue with it.