From: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
To: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>,
Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++/modules: Prevent overwriting arguments for duplicates [PR112588]
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 12:04:47 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8f429848-9e1a-38b7-4120-865b55780c1a@idea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <659ab54e.630a0220.291d5.8735@mx.google.com>
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 05:32:37PM -0500, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > I;m not sure about this, there was clearly a reason I did it the way it is,
> > but perhaps that reasoning became obsolete -- something about an existing
> > declaration and reading in a definition maybe?
> >
> > nathan
>
> So I took a bit of a closer look and this is actually a regression,
> seeming to start with r13-3134-g09df0d8b14dda6. I haven't looked more
> closely at the actual change though to see whether this implies a
> different fix yet though.
Interesting.. FWIW I applied your patch to the gcc 12 release branch,
which doesn't have r13-3134, and there were no modules testsuite
regressions there either, which at least suggests that this maybe_dup
logic isn't directly related to the optimization that r13-3134 removed.
Your patch also seems to fix PR99244 (which AFAICT is not a regression)
>
> Nathaniel
>
> > On 11/22/23 06:33, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
> > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I don't have write
> > > access.
> > >
> > > -- >8 --
> > >
> > > When merging duplicate instantiations of function templates, currently
> > > read_function_def overwrites the arguments with that of the existing
> > > duplicate. This is problematic, however, since this means that the
> > > PARM_DECLs in the body of the function definition no longer match with
> > > the PARM_DECLs in the argument list, which causes issues when it comes
> > > to generating RTL.
> > >
> > > There doesn't seem to be any reason to do this replacement, so this
> > > patch removes that logic.
> > >
> > > PR c++/112588
> > >
> > > gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > > * module.cc (trees_in::read_function_def): Don't overwrite
> > > arguments.
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > > * g++.dg/modules/merge-16.h: New test.
> > > * g++.dg/modules/merge-16_a.C: New test.
> > > * g++.dg/modules/merge-16_b.C: New test.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > gcc/cp/module.cc | 2 --
> > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16.h | 10 ++++++++++
> > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16_a.C | 7 +++++++
> > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16_b.C | 5 +++++
> > > 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16.h
> > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16_a.C
> > > create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16_b.C
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/module.cc b/gcc/cp/module.cc
> > > index 4f5b6e2747a..2520ab659cc 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/cp/module.cc
> > > +++ b/gcc/cp/module.cc
> > > @@ -11665,8 +11665,6 @@ trees_in::read_function_def (tree decl, tree maybe_template)
> > > DECL_RESULT (decl) = result;
> > > DECL_INITIAL (decl) = initial;
> > > DECL_SAVED_TREE (decl) = saved;
> > > - if (maybe_dup)
> > > - DECL_ARGUMENTS (decl) = DECL_ARGUMENTS (maybe_dup);
> > > if (context)
> > > SET_DECL_FRIEND_CONTEXT (decl, context);
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16.h b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16.h
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..fdb38551103
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > > +// PR c++/112588
> > > +
> > > +void f(int*);
> > > +
> > > +template <typename T>
> > > +struct S {
> > > + void g(int n) { f(&n); }
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +template struct S<void>;
If we use a partial specialization here instead (which would have disabled
the removed optimization, demonstrating how fragile/inconsistent it was)
void f(int*);
template <typename T>
struct S { };
template<typename T>
struct S<T*> {
void g(int n) { f(&n); }
};
template struct S<void*>;
then the ICE appears earlier, since GCC 12 instead of 13.
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16_a.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16_a.C
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..c243224c875
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16_a.C
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> > > +// PR c++/112588
> > > +// { dg-additional-options "-fmodules-ts" }
> > > +// { dg-module-cmi merge16 }
> > > +
> > > +module;
> > > +#include "merge-16.h"
> > > +export module merge16;
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16_b.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16_b.C
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..8c7b1f0511f
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/merge-16_b.C
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> > > +// PR c++/112588
> > > +// { dg-additional-options "-fmodules-ts" }
> > > +
> > > +#include "merge-16.h"
> > > +import merge16;
> >
> > --
> > Nathan Sidwell
> >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-08 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-22 11:33 Nathaniel Shead
2023-12-16 10:50 ` [PATCH] c++/modules: Prevent overwriting arguments when merging " Nathaniel Shead
2024-01-02 22:49 ` Nathaniel Shead
2024-01-06 22:32 ` [PATCH] c++/modules: Prevent overwriting arguments for " Nathan Sidwell
2024-01-07 14:29 ` Nathaniel Shead
2024-01-08 17:04 ` Patrick Palka [this message]
2024-01-17 16:28 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8f429848-9e1a-38b7-4120-865b55780c1a@idea \
--to=ppalka@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=nathan@acm.org \
--cc=nathanieloshead@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).