From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 67520 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2015 17:02:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 67491 invoked by uid 89); 23 Oct 2015 17:02:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: edge20.ethz.ch Received: from edge20.ethz.ch (HELO edge20.ethz.ch) (82.130.99.26) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:02:32 +0000 Received: from CAS21.d.ethz.ch (172.31.51.111) by edge20.ethz.ch (82.130.99.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.266.1; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:02:23 +0200 Received: from MBX13.d.ethz.ch ([fe80::c4aa:956e:5014:ce66]) by CAS21.d.ethz.ch ([fe80::55ba:c4a5:d8a7:ab62%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 19:02:28 +0200 From: "VandeVondele Joost" To: Szabolcs Nagy , Matthias Klose , Sebastian Pop CC: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH] select isl-0.15 in download_prerequisites Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD9339EECEA8@MBX13.d.ethz.ch> References: <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD933895F9C9@MBX23.d.ethz.ch> ,<55EB08A3.8040602@ubuntu.com> <908103EDB4893A42920B21D3568BFD9338960F8E@MBX23.d.ethz.ch>,<562A6277.2080804@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <562A6277.2080804@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg02478.txt.bz2 > can isl-0.15 be built with 4.8 and 4.9? ..with an old libc? isl-0.15 builds for me with gcc 4.6.4, 4.7.4, 4.8.3, 4.9.2, not sure about = older libc. I can't find any reference to max_align_t in the isl-0.15 source. (for me actually also isl-0.14 builds fine down to gcc 4.6). Maybe somebody with an older toolchain could test ?