From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43797 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2018 06:11:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 43346 invoked by uid 89); 30 Jan 2018 06:11:37 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 06:11:36 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C4C9793EC; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 06:11:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-112-50.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.112.50]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D181061F24; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 06:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Ping: Expand vec_perm_indices::series_p comment To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , richard.sandiford@linaro.org References: <87indfmrgt.fsf@linaro.org> <87shcjjxcc.fsf@linaro.org> <87r2rq314b.fsf@linaro.org> <87k1wxvp6r.fsf@linaro.org> <20180109121729.GA16646@arm.com> <87zi5nav7r.fsf_-_@linaro.org> <87lgggh03i.fsf_-_@linaro.org> From: Jeff Law Message-ID: <90cfdc7b-5044-ebc2-f3ef-dd78b43c51f8@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:20:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87lgggh03i.fsf_-_@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg02319.txt.bz2 On 01/29/2018 01:38 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Ping > > Richard Sandiford writes: >> James Greenhalgh writes: >>> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 11:27:56AM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote: >>>> Ping**2 >>> >>> This is OK. >> >> Thanks. >> >>> It took me a while to get the hang of the interface - a worked example >>> in the comment in vec-perm-indices.c would probably have been helpful. >>> It took until your code for REV for this to really make sense to me; so >>> perhaps that make for a good example. >> >> Yeah, good idea. >> >> Is the following OK? Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu. >> >> Thanks, >> Richard >> >> >> 2018-01-09 Richard Sandiford >> >> gcc/ >> * vec-perm-indices.c (vec_perm_indices::series_p): Give examples >> of usage. OK jeff