[PATCH] MATCH: Transform `(1 >> X) !=/== 0` into `X ==/!= 0`

[PATCH] MATCH: Transform `(1 >> X) !=/== 0` into `X ==/!= 0`

[Andrew Pinski]

We currently have a pattern for handling `(C >> X) & D == 0`
but if C is 1 and D is 1, the `& 1` might have been removed.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	PR tree-optimization/105832
	* match.pd (`(1 >> X) != 0`): New pattern

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	PR tree-optimization/105832
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-1.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-2.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-3.c: New test.
---
 gcc/match.pd                               | 10 ++++-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-1.c | 25 ++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-2.c | 30 ++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-3.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-1.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-2.c
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-3.c

diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
index 5270e4104ac..e9ce48ea7fa 100644
--- a/gcc/match.pd
+++ b/gcc/match.pd
@@ -4026,7 +4026,8 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
 
 /* Simplify ((C << x) & D) != 0 where C and D are power of two constants,
    either to false if D is smaller (unsigned comparison) than C, or to
-   x == log2 (D) - log2 (C).  Similarly for right shifts.  */
+   x == log2 (D) - log2 (C).  Similarly for right shifts.
+   Note for `(1 >> x)`, the & 1 has been removed so matching that seperately. */
 (for cmp (ne eq)
      icmp (eq ne)
  (simplify
@@ -4043,7 +4044,12 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
 	    int c2 = wi::clz (wi::to_wide (@2)); }
      (if (c1 > c2)
       { constant_boolean_node (cmp == NE_EXPR ? false : true, type); }
-      (icmp @0 { build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (@0), c2 - c1); }))))))
+      (icmp @0 { build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (@0), c2 - c1); })))))
+ /* `(1 >> X) != 0` -> `X == 0` */
+ /* `(1 >> X) == 0` -> `X != 0` */
+ (simplify
+  (cmp (rshift integer_onep @0) integer_zerop)
+   (icmp @0 { build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (@0)); })))
 
 /* (CST1 << A) == CST2 -> A == ctz (CST2) - ctz (CST1)
    (CST1 << A) != CST2 -> A != ctz (CST2) - ctz (CST1)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-1.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d7029d39c85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
+/* PR tree-optimization/105832 */
+
+void foo(void);
+
+static struct {
+    short a;
+    signed char b;
+} c;
+
+static signed char d;
+
+int main() {
+    signed char g = c.b > 4U ? c.b : c.b << 2;
+    for (int h = 0; h < 5; h++) {
+        d = (g >= 2 || 1 >> g) ? g : g << 1;
+        if (d && 1 == g)
+            foo();
+        c.a = 0;
+    }
+}
+
+/* The call of foo should have been removed. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not "foo " "optimized" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2d2a33e2755
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/105832 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-original" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return a == 0;" "original" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return b == 0;" "original" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return c != 0;" "original" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return d != 0;" "original" } } */
+
+int
+f1 (int a)
+{
+  return (1 >> a) != 0;
+}
+
+int
+f2 (int b)
+{
+  return ((1 >> b) & 1) != 0;
+}
+int
+f3 (int c)
+{
+  return (1 >> c) == 0;
+}
+
+int
+f4 (int d)
+{
+  return ((1 >> d) & 1) == 0;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-3.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2bdd9afcbc7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr105832-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/105832 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* Disable the first forwprop1 as that will catch f2/f4 even though `&1`
+   will be removed during evrp. */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdisable-tree-forwprop1 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "a_\[0-9]+\\(D\\) == 0" "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "b_\[0-9]+\\(D\\) == 0" "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "c_\[0-9]+\\(D\\) != 0" "optimized" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "d_\[0-9]+\\(D\\) != 0" "optimized" } } */
+
+int g(void);
+int h(void);
+
+int
+f1 (int a)
+{
+  int t = 1 >> a;
+  if (t != 0) return g();
+  return h();
+}
+
+int
+f2 (int b)
+{
+  int t = 1 >> b;
+  t &= 1;
+  if (t != 0) return g();
+  return h();
+}
+
+int
+f3 (int c)
+{
+  int t = 1 >> c;
+  if (t == 0) return g();
+  return h();
+}
+
+int
+f4 (int d)
+{
+  int t = 1 >> d;
+  t &= 1;
+  if (t == 0) return g();
+  return h();
+}
-- 
2.31.1

Re: [PATCH] MATCH: Transform `(1 >> X) !=/== 0` into `X ==/!= 0`

[Jeff Law]

On 9/3/23 10:25, Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches wrote:
> We currently have a pattern for handling `(C >> X) & D == 0`
> but if C is 1 and D is 1, the `& 1` might have been removed.
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	PR tree-optimization/105832
> 	* match.pd (`(1 >> X) != 0`): New pattern
OK
jeff